ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The fourth generation university labor; and action approach (case studies: Cambridge, Stanford, and Harvard universities
Today's competition in the countries of the world is affected by globalization and other processes. In the competition, intangible assets such as knowledge or social capital are the keys to the economic development engine. A culture of excellence in education is necessary for the potential ability to act effectively in the field of economic development, but it is not enough to maintain the quality standards for research activities and promote the use of results in the local and global economy. The purpose of this paper is to examine and present the components of the fourth-generation universities and their role in the local and global economy. The research method is descriptive and analytical. Data collection and analysis have been carried out using available resources in academic libraries, authentic journals and higher education functions in such researchers. Several studies and approaches of the present age show that higher education is towards becoming professional and university as a source of valuable knowledge in generating economic growth through public awareness as well as relationships and networking between different sectors of mission and task transmission. The analytical results of this study will help the universities of the country change their approaches from education and research to value added universities of work and practice through the impact of local and global economy and using valuable human capital resources.
https://ijee.ias.ac.ir/article_75132_0c444cb7d8743dffc45234465e0ea738.pdf
2018-08-23
1
16
10.22047/ijee.2018.128487.1541
university
Functions
Business
Education
Economics
Mehrdad
Goudarzvand chegini
goodarzvand@iaurasht.ac.ir
1
Professor, Department of public management, faculty of accounting and management, Islamic Azad university, Rasht branch, iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
جعفریمقدم، سعید (1390). مستندسازی تجربیان مدیران (از دیدگاه مدیریت دانش). مؤسسه تحقیقات و آموزش مدیریت. چاپ سوم.
1
قدیری، اسلام و رضوی آل هاشم، بهراد (1390). کارکردهای روابط عمومی کارآمد در دانشگاهها، ماهنامه دانشگاه تهران، 47، 59-54.
2
موسوی، سیدحسین، صالحی عمران، ابراهیم، فراستخواه، مقصود و توفیقی، جعفر (1396). ارائه مدل توسعه دانشگاه کارآفرین در ایران، فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 19، (76)، 1-28.
3
Amin, M.; Ismail, W. K. W.; Abdul Richard, S. Z. and Selemani, R. D. (2014). The impact of human resource management practices on performance: Evidence from a public university, The TQM Journal, 26(2), 125 – 142.
4
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation, New York: Pergamon.
5
Dabic, M.; Loureiro, M. and Daim, T. (2015). Unraveling the attitudes on entrepreneurial universities: the case of Croatian and Spanish universities, Technology in Society, 42, 167-178.
6
Davis, G. (2014). The university plan 2011- 2014, the Melbourne vision: Growing Esteem, 1-21.
7
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university, International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1, 64-77. 9.
8
Fallah, F. (2012). Students’ attitudes about socio-cultural functions of the universities, Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1),73-90.
9
Gunasekara, C. S. (2004). The regional role of universities in technology transfer and economic development. in: Proceedings British Academy of Management Conference 2004. St Andrews, Scotland. http://ebookbrowse.com/bam2004-paper-unis-pdf-d74991082. Downloaded: 3 August 2012.
10
Hendriks, P. (2014). Asymmetries between language production and comprehension. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
11
Hendriks Paul H. J. and Sousa Célio A. A. (2013). Practices of management knowing in university research management, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(3), 611 – 62.
12
Hillier, Yvonne. (2013) Working together: community and university partnerships, Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 3(2), 94 – 106.
13
Hopkinson, P. (2012), Ecoversity: The potential for sustainable development to reshape university culture and action, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 9(4), 378-91.
14
Jimoh, O. A. and Danlami Sani, A. (2012). European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, ISSN 1450-2275 Issue 32.
15
Kirby, D. A. (2006). Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599-603.
16
Kont, K. R. and Jantson, S. (2013). Library employees’ attitudes towards the measurement and appraisal of their work performance: Study in Estonian University libraries, Library Management, 34(6/7), 521 – 537.
17
Lengyel, B. (2004). Egyetem – gazdaság – kormányzat együttműködése: A triple helix modell a gyakorlatban. In Lengyel I. (eds.): A Szegedi Tudományegyetem lehetőségei a tudásalapú helyi gazdaságfejlesztésben. Kutatási háttéranyagok V. kötet. K+F és egyetemek az Európai Unióban. Szeged, pp. 1-31.
18
Liu, Y. (2012). Does entrepreneurial university really exist in China? A case from Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 4.
19
Lord, M. (2014). Smaller university endowments: team characteristics, portfolio composition and performance, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 6(1), 4 – 32.
20
Mapulanga, P. (2013). Changing economic conditions for libraries: Fundraising performance in the University of Malawi libraries, Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 26(2), 59 – 69.
21
Mix, V. L. (2013). Library and university governance: Partners in student success, Reference Services Review, 41(2), 253-265.
22
Palme, U. (2012), Good examples of education for sustainable development at chalmers: achievements and limitations, paper presented at engineering education in sustainable development, Go¨teborg, September 19-22.
23
Philpott, K.; Dooley, L.; O’Reilly, C. and Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 61-70.
24
Sanchez, M. P. and Elena, S.(2006). Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal managementn. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(4), 529-548.
25
Shaoming, L. and Hui-shu, Z. (2014) A comparative study of education for sustainable development in one British university and one Chinese university, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(1), 48 – 62.
26
Sporn, B. (2001). Building adaptive universities: emerging organizational froms based on based on experiences of European and US universities. Teriary Educaton and Management, 7(2), 121-134.
27
Tang, K. (2013). Quality assurance improvements in Australian university libraries, Performance Measurement and Metrics, 4(1), 36 - 44.
28
Taatila, V. and Down, S. (2012). Measuring entrepreneurial orientation of university students, Education + Training, 54(8/9), 744 – 760.
29
Todorovic, Z.; McNaughton, R. and Guild, P. (2015). ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities, Technovation 31 128–137.
30
Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the third generation university. Managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.
31
Zaqout, F. and Abbas, M. (2012).Towards a model for understanding the influence of the factors that stimulate university students’ engagement and performance in knowledge sharing, Library Review, 61(5), 345 – 361.
32
www.harvard.edu
33
www.stanford.edu
34
www.cam.ac.uk
35
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Conceptual framework of e-manufacturing educational components for engineering educations with SEM approach
In the past three decades, technical and professional educations have been promoted in the developing countries and focus of engineering educations have been based on new pioneer technologies. The target of this paper is presentation of framework for exploration of e-manufacturing components for engineer's education. This research is done considering mixed research method in 3 phases. In the first phase the 7 steps method of Barroso and Sndlvsky meta-synthesis was used and primary conceptual framework was created. Then in the second phase by semi-structured interviewing with experts, supplementary model was concluded. In the third phase, in order for quantitative validation of the proposed framework, various statistical tests and confirmatory factor analysis have been used. Also structural equation modeling and path analysis for checking accuracy of assumptions is used. Testing model is carried via SmartPLS 3 software and after confirmation of path coefficients and meaningful coefficient (t-values), the model is checked with Cv-Red and Cv-Com indexes. Results of test indexes showed suitability of the proposed framework. Furhter results of the mentioned steps emphasized the scientific validity of research framework, thus research framework with 2 key components of (Management educations and Technology educations) and 8 sub components( EMS , SCM , CRM , E-Diagnostics , E-Maintenance , E-Commerce , New communication technology and Advanced manufacturing technologies) were confirmed .
https://ijee.ias.ac.ir/article_77036_d8a47f3b60feddcc92e28d4eca05f0d3.pdf
2018-08-23
17
36
10.22047/ijee.2018.150276.1583
E-manufacturing
Engineering educations
Management educations
Technology educations
SEM
kamran
feizi
kamfeizy@chmail.ir
1
Full professor of Allame Tabataba’i University -Management & Accounting faculty-Tehran-Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Mohamad Taghi
Taghavifard
drtaghavifard@gmail.com
2
Associate Professor of Allame Tabataba’i University -Management & Accounting faculty-Tehran-Iran
AUTHOR
Jahaniar
Bamdad soofi
bamdadsoofi@yahoo.com
3
Assistant professor of Allame Tabataba’i University- Management & Accounting faculty -Tehran-Iran
AUTHOR
Hosein
vahidy
vahidy@chmail.ir
4
Allame Tabataba,i University
AUTHOR
آذر، عــادل؛ غلامــزاده، رســول و قنــواتی، مهــدی ( 1391). چهارچوب ســازی مســیری ســـاختاری درمـدیریت،کاربرد نـرم افـزار- Smart PLS . تهـران: انتشارات نگاه دانش.
1
دوامی، پرویز و خدابخشپیرکلانی، مریم .(1389). مهندسی چیست؟ و مهندس کیست؟ فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 12(45)، 55-35 .
2
صالحی عمران، ابراهیم (1389). رویکردهای نظری در برنامههای درسی آموزش صنعتی. فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی ایران، 5(19)، 42 ـ8.
3
صوفی، منصور(1392). بررسی موانع پیاده سازی کارخانجات الکترونیکی در ایران با رویکرد AHP ، معاونت پژوهشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی رشت.
4
محقر، علی؛ جعفرنژاد، احمد؛ مدرس یزدی، محمد و صادقی مقدم، محمدرضا (1392). ارائه الگو جامع هماهنگی اطلاعاتی شبکه تأمین خودروسازی با استفاده از روش فرا ترکیب، فصلنامه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 5(4): 161-194.
5
مرتضوی، محسن(1393). نقش فناوری اطلاعات در تولید و ساخت، ماهنامه تدبیر، 17(248).
6
معماریان، حسین(1390). روشهای نوین دانشجو محور در آموزش، فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 13(52)، 21-1.
7
هومن، حیدرعلی(1387) راهنمای عملی فرا تحلیل در پژوهش علمی. تهران: سازمان سمت.
8
یزدانی، غلامرضا(1392). چالشهای آموزش مهندسی در ایران. ماهنامه امواج برتر،10(65)،15.
9
Bottani, E. and Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11 (4), 294308.
10
Cha, A. S. K. (2014). Cofounder CTO ACS Corp in Korea, December, 2nd.
11
Cheng, K. (2008). E-Manufacturing: fundamentals, applications and potentials. Advanced manufacturing and enterprise engineering (AMEE) group, School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK .
12
Cheng, K. and Bateman, R. J. (2008). E-Manufacturing: characteristics, applications and potentials. Progr. Nat. Sci., 18, 1323–1328.
13
Cheng, F. T.; Tsai, W. H.; Wang, T. L.; Chang, J. Y.-C. and Su, Y. C. (2010). Advanced E-manufacturing model- The significance of large-scale, distributed, and object-oriented Systems, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 17(1)71-83.
14
Chencg, F. T.; Tsai, W. H. and Wang, T. L. (2010). Jonathanchanchangyung-Chehengandyu-Chuansu. Advanced e-manufacturing model, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine.
15
Cheng, F. T.; Yang, H. C. and Lin, J. Y. (2014). Development of holonic information coordination systems with failure-recovery considerations, IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng., 1(1), 58–72.
16
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). (2000). Manufacturing 2020 Foresight report.
17
Fu, Y. and Jiang, P., (2009). Study on e-service node for service-oriented manufacturing execution system, International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, CIE July 2009, Troyes, France, 635-639.
18
Gao, R.; Wang, L.; Teti, R.; Dornfeld, D.; Kumara, S.; Mori, M. and Helu, M. (2015). Cloud-enabled prognosis for manufacturing. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 64(2): 749-772.
19
Gerhard, G. and Ghoshal, R. (2014). Practical e-manufacturing and supply chain management, first published, Elsevier.
20
Hosseini, S. A.; Nosratabadi, A.; Okhovat, M. A; Nehzati, T. and Ismail, N. (2012). E-manufacturing: Challenges and enablers, applied mechanics and materials. 29-231, 2567-2571© Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.
21
Kar, A. K. (2009), Modeling of supplier selection in e-procurement as a multi-criteria decision making problem,” http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-40.
22
Koç, M. and Lee. L.(2002).e-Manufacturing and e-Maintenance applications and benefits, International Conference on Responsive Manufacturing (ICRM) 2002, Gaziantep, Turkey, June 26–29.
23
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575.
24
Lee, J.; Ali, A. and Koc, V. (2001). e-Manufacturing-its elements and impact, Proceedings of the Annual Institute of Industrial Engineering Conference, V. 23, Dallas, Tex, USA, May 2001.
25
Lee, J. (2013). E-Manufacturingfundamental, tools, and transformation. Robot Comput-Int Manuf 19(6):501–507.
26
Menezes, S.; Creado, S. and Zhong, R. Y. (2018). Smart manufacturing execution systems for small and medium-sized enterprises, 51st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, available online at www.sciencedirect.com
27
Milosevic, M.; Lukić, D.; Antic, A. and Vukman, J. (2016). e-Manufacturing: framework for a collaborative distibuted manufacturing. The 11 International Conferences of the Carpathian Euro-region Specialists in Industrial Systems, CEurSIS 2016,2-4 June, Baia Mare, Romania.
28
Mohamed Sahid, F.; Mohamed Ashraf, M. J.; Mohammed, K. I.; Desa, S.; Mohd Rodzi, R. and Nurhidayat, M. (2014). A review of current trend in e-Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Faculty.
29
Nof, S. Y. (2006). Collaborative e-Work and e-Manufacturing: Challenges for production and logistics managers. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2006, 17, 689–701.
30
Nyanga, L. and Van Der Merwe, A. F. (2011). e-Manufacturing - the roadmap for south african manufacturers, ISEM 2011 Proceedings, September 21-23, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
31
Ramarao, V. (2016). Analysis of e-Manufacturing capabilities and characteristics, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 03(09).
32
Ramarao, A.; Ratnam, C. h. and Sridhar C. N. V. (2011). A proposal for criteria evaluation and selection of ISPs for e-Manufacturing, IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(3).
33
Saha, R. and Grover, S. (2011). Identifying enablers of e-Manufacturing, international scholarly research network, ISRN Mechanical Engineering, Volume 2011, Article ID 193124, 6 pages doi:10.5402/2011/193124.
34
Sandelowski, M. and Barroso, J.(2003). Reading qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods.1 (1):74-108.
35
Shaver, J. M. (2005). Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications and alternative strategies. Journal of Management, (31), 330-353.
36
Shivanand, H. K.; Nanjundaradhya, N. V. and Kammar, P.(2008). e-Manufacturing a technology review. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London, UK, 2. Smart manufacturingcoalition.org visited at 2017/05/08.
37
Sridhar C. N. V.; Reddy, V.; Reddy, V. (2010). Evolution of e-Manufacturing and capabilities-A Review. The Technology World-Malaysia, 5, (1), 25-34, 2010.
38
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, California.
39
Tiwari, M. K.; Jha, S. J. and Anand, R. B. (2010). Operation allocation and part type selection in e-Manufacturing: An auction based heuristic supported by agent technology, Robotics and Computer-Integrated, 26, pp 312–324.
40
Wang, L. D. (2007). An information-integrated framework to support e-Manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manufacturing. Technology, 32, 625–630.
41
Wang, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, L.; Gao, R. X. and Wu, D. (2018). Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Method sandapplications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48(C), 144-156.
42
Wuest, T.; Weimer, D.; Irgens, C. and Klaus, D. T. (2016). Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications. Prod Manuf Res 4(1):23–45.
43
Zaletelj, V.; Sluga, A. and Butala, P. (2008). A conceptual framework for the collaborative modelling of networked manufacturing systems, Concurrent Engineering, 16(1), 103-114.
44
Zhong, R. Y.; Dai, Q. Y.; Qu, T.; Hu, G. J. and Huang, G. Q. .(2013). RFID enabled real-time manufacturing execution system for masscustomization Production. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 29(2): 283-292.
45
Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing withtexts. Journal of Advanced.ac.uk
46
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Promotion and development of entrepreneurship competencies in university students
The main purpose of this research is to identifying methods of promotion and development of entrepreneurship competencies in university students. Entrepreneurship consist a set of complex and multidimensional competencies that there growth is not possible with direct teaching methods and it needs some ranges of methods, resources and possibilities. In this research through qualitative approach, 3 consultative interviews have been hold. Two interviews with 7 expertise familiar with entrepreneurship background and one interview with 16 members of a principle group from Bu-Ali University faculty board members. The data analyzes has been shown using content analysis method comprehensive, organized and basic concepts. In cultural and extra-curricular areas some proposals have been provided such as publishing the news in entrepreneurship field, setting up the exhibitions, job counseling, official courses, holding industrial camps, creating alumni association, conducting tournaments and invite the entrepreneurs. In educational areas we can suggest the reviewing on curriculum, improving courses qualities, introducing university courses to society, granting privileges to professors and students and developing workshops and training opportunities. In research areas with introducing university capacities to society, developing growth (Roshd) centers. In managerial area, prepare the midterm and yearly entrepreneurship plan, strengthening the managerial beliefs for providing the bases of entrepreneurship opportunities for students.
https://ijee.ias.ac.ir/article_77037_62c6eabd258564e51e57476bcb973a32.pdf
2018-08-23
37
56
10.22047/ijee.2018.117793.1511
entrepreneurship promotion
Student
university
competencies
فرهاد
سراجی
fseraji@gmail.com
1
دانشیار دانشکده علوم تربیتی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان
LEAD_AUTHOR
آراستی، زهرا؛ حیدری، هومان و مبارکی، محمدحسن (1393). ارزیابی اثربخشی روش آموزش کارآفرینی
1
«سخنران مهمان». فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی، 7(3)، 389- 406.
2
ادیب، یوسف و مردان اربط، فاطمه (1393). پدیدارشناسی تجربیات و ادراکات کارآفرینان از پدیدة کارآفرینی: یک مطالعه کیفی. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی، 7(3)، 447- 467.
3
احمدی، غلامعلی و فضائلیفر، زینب (1392). تحلیل محتوای کتابهای آموزش حرفه و فن دوره راهنمایی بر اساس شاخصهای کارآفرینی. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی، 6(1)، 184-165.
4
احمدپور داریانی، محمود و عزیزی، محمد (1383). مبانی کارآفرینی. تهران: انتشارات وزارت آموزش و پرورش.
5
بازرگان، عباس (1388). مقدمهای بر روش تحقیق کیفی و آمیخته. تهران: دیدار.
6
جعفریمقدم، سعید؛ زالی، محمدرضا و جلیلزاده، مریم(1390). عوامل بازدارنده قصد کارآفرینانه دانشجویان: مورد مطالعه دانشگاه تهران، فصلنامه اقتصاد و تجارت نوین، 25، 51- 27.
7
حسینی، مریم(1394). معرفی روش کانونی و کاربرد آن در تحقیقات. چاپ دوم، تهران: مرکز پژوهش و سنجش افکار سازمان صدا و سیما.
8
حسینینیا، غلامحسین؛ عطایی، پوریا و یعقوبی فرانی، احمد (1396). ارزیابی مهارتها و ویژگیهای کارآفرینانه دانشجویان و تأثیر آن بر قصد کارآفرینی (مورد مطالعه: مراکز آموزش علمی ـ کاربردی مهارت). فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران. 73، 44-25.
9
صفری، سعید و سمیعزاده، مهدی (1391). نیازسنجی آموزش دانش و مهارت کارآفرینی در رشتههای علوم انسانی، فناوری آموزش، 13(1)، 79-65.
10
فرامزینیا، ضرغام؛ فرهادیراد، حمید و مهرعلیزاده، یداله (1395). تحلیل امکان پیادهسازی دانشگاه مدل کارآفرین در دانشگاه شهید چمران. فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران. 18 (1)، 86- 65.
11
فلیک، اوه (1394). در آمدی بر تحقیق کیفی. ترجمه هادی جلیلی، چاپ چهارم. تهران: نی.
12
محمدی الیاسی، قنبر؛ فراستخواه، مقصود و فرخ، شیما (1391). مهارتهای استادان و مربیان کارآفرینی برای پرورش کارآفرینان نوپا در دانشگاهها. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی، 3(3)، 185-201.
13
محمدی الیاسی، قنبر و نوتاش، هادی(1390). شناسایی ریشههای شکست کارآفرینان کارکشته ایرانی: نگاهی روایتی گفتمانی. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی، 4(1)، 31-50.
14
محمدی الیاسی، قنبر؛ ابیلی، خدایار و مثنوی، ندا(1392). شناسایی الگوی منابع روشهای یادگیری کارآفرینان نوپا. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی،6(4)، 75-93.
15
مرتضینژاد، نیلوفر؛ عطاران، محمد؛ حسینیخواه، علی و عباسی، عفت(1396). بررسی عناصر طراحی برنامه درسی کارآفرینی بر اساس رویکرد تطبیقی. فصلنامه مطالعات برنامهدرسی،11(4)،80-49.
16
موحدی، رضا؛ حیدری ترازک، خدیجه و سعدی، حشمتاله (1395). موقعیت برنامهدرسی کارآفرینی در دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاههای بوعلیسینا، رازی و کردستان. فصلنامه مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی، 36(4)،
17
نویدی، احد و محمودی کهریز، بهرام(1391). ضرورت و راههای توسعه مهارتهای عمومی برای اشتغالپذیری در جامعه دانشمحور. فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، 28(4)، 15-36.
18
یدالهی فارسی، جهانگیر و میرعرب، رضا (1388). بررسی ارائه برنامهدرسی آموزش کارآفرینی در رشته علوم تربیتی. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی، 2(1)، 80 -61.
19
Brush, C. G. (2014). Exploring the concept of an entrepreneurship education ecosystem. Innovative Pathways for University Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century (pp. 25-39). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
20
Fichter, K. and Tiemann, I. (2018). Factors influencing university support for sustainable entrepreneurship: Insights from explorative case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 512-524.
21
Kuratko. D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5) 577-598.
22
Lonappan, J. and Devaraj, K. (2011). Pedagogical innovations in teaching entrepreneurship. Eight AIMS International Conference on Management, January 1-4, 513-518.
23
Morris, M. H. and Kuratko, D. F. (2014). Building university 21st century Entrepreneurship programs that empower and transform. Innovative Pathways for University Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century (pp. 1-24). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
24
Neck, H. M. and Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55-70.
25
Othman, N.; Hashim, N. and Ab Wahid. H. (2012). Readiness towards entrepreneurship education students and Malaysian universities. Education + Training. 54(89), 697-708.
26
Peltonen, K. (2015) How can teachers’ entrepreneurial competences be developed? A collaborative learning perspective. Education + Training, 57(5), 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2014-0033.
27
Premand, P.; Brodmann, S.; Almeida, R.; Grun, R. and Barouni, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship education and entry into self-employment among university graduates. World Development, 77, 311-327.
28
Stal, E.; Andreassi, T. and Fujino, A. (2016). The role of university incubators in stimulating academic entrepreneurship. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(2), 89-98.
29
Sánchez, B. V. and Sahuquillo, A. C. (2017). Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: the role of entrepreneurship education. European Research on Management and Business Economics.
30
Tong, A.; Sainsbury, P. and Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357.
31
Turker, D. and Selcuk, S. S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(2), 142-159.
32
Welsh, D. H.; Tullar, W. L. and Nemati, H. (2016). Entrepreneurship education: Process, method, or both?. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 1(3), 125-132.
33
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Examining relationship between professional skills and curricula innovation among faculty members of university of Isfahan and Isfahan University of Technology
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between professional skills and curricula innovations among faculty members of Isfahan University and Isfahan University of Technology. The research method was descriptive-survey. The statistical population in this study included all the faculty members of Isfahan University and Isfahan University of Technology. Method of sampling was stratified random sampling and 90 persons (20 persons from technical-engineering department of University of Isfahan and 70 persons from technical-engineering department of Isfahan University of Technology) were selected as sample. Research data has been collected through standard questionnaire of professional skills and curricula innovations which is prepared by researcher. Results showed that there is significant relationship between the professional skills (educational designing, educational technology, teaching method and educational evaluation) with faculty members curricula innovations.
https://ijee.ias.ac.ir/article_75134_c969407ee266e750ee2ae3ab9d4cc457.pdf
2018-08-23
57
75
10.22047/ijee.2018.141141.1562
Professional skills
curricula innovations
engineering education
Majid
Amiri
majid.amiri@yahoo.com
1
Payame nour University
AUTHOR
setareh
Mousavi
setarehmousavi@gmail.com
2
educational sciences, Uni of Isfahan
LEAD_AUTHOR
Saeed
Rajaipour
s.rajaipour@edu.ui.ac.ir
3
Associate Professor, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan University
AUTHOR
اشراقی، رویا (1396). مؤلفههای تأثیرگذار بر توسعه حرفهای اعضای هیأتعلمی (مطالعه موردی: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان ایلام). فصلنامه بینالمللی مدیریت کشاورزی و توسعه، 7(4)4، 499-508.
1
جعفری، حسن؛ ابوالقاسمی، محمود؛ قهرمانی، محمد و خراسانی، اباصلت (1396). الگوی توسعه حرفهای معلمان ابتدایی (مطالعه موردی: مدارس استثنایی گروه کمتوان ذهنی شهر تهران). روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، 7(25)، 95-75.
2
رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون و جمالی، مهدی (1396). توسعه حرفهای بازار سرمایه ایران مبتنی بر رویکرد مهندسی مالی و تأثیر آن بر کیفیت حسابداری و حسابرسی. فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 23، 11-30.
3
سراجی، فرهاد؛ کرمی، زهره و معروفی، یحیی (1396). برنامه درسی روایتپژوهی و توسعه حرفهای دانشجویان دانشگاه فرهنگیان: طراحی الگوی برنامه درسی. نشریه نظریه و عمل در برنامه درسی، 9، 69-104.
4
سرگزی، زهرا؛ ناستیزابی، ناصر و پورغاز، عبدالوهاب (1394). رابطه شایستگیهای محوری با عملکرد مدیران گروههای آموزشی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان. پژوهشهای مدیریتی، 8(30)، 52-33.
5
شریفزاده، محمد و عبداللهزاده، غلامحسین (1394). مؤلفههای توسعه آموزش کارآفرینی در نظام آموزشعالی کشاورزی. فصلنامه پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی، 32، 96-112
6
فتحی و اجارگاه، کوروش و نورزاده، داریوش (1388)، درآمدی بر برنامهریزی درسی دانشگاهی، تهران: مؤسسه پژوهش و برنامهریزی آموزش عالی.
7
مطهرینژاد، حسین؛ یعقوبی، محمود و دوامی، پرویز (1391). ضرورتهای اصلی در تدوین راهبردهای آموزش مهندسی ایران: بخش دوم: مقایسه دیدگاه مدیران بخش صنعت و اعضای هیأت علمی. فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 14(55)، 1-21.
8
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1386)، بازاندیشی فرآیند یاددهی ـ یادگیری در تربیت معلم، تهران: انتشارات مدرسه.
9
میرکمالی، سید محمد؛ پورکریمی، جواد و حجری، اکرم (1394). بررسی رابطه توسعه حرفهای با نوآوری برنامهریزی درسی اعضای هیأتعلمی مهندسی. فصلنامه ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 5 (17)17،1-21.
10
نادری، عزتالله و سیف نراقی، مریم (1387)، روشهای تحقیق و چگونگی ارزشیابی آن در علوم انسانی با تأکید بر علوم تربیتی، تهران: انتشارات ارسباران، چاپ دوم.
11
نورادصدیق، میترا؛ عبدارحیم نوه ابراهیم، عبدالرحیم؛ آراسته، حمیدرضا و زین آبادی، حسن رضا (1396). شناسایی مؤلفههای توسعه حرفهای مدیران با استعداد مدارس غیردولتی؛ پژوهشی آمیخته. نشریه مدیریت بر آموزش سازمانها، 6(2)، 183-224.
12
Ackfeldt, A. L. and Coote, L. V. (2005). A study of organizational citizenship behaviors in retail setting. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 151-159.
13
Becker, G. ( 2000). How the web is revolutionizing learning. Business Week, December 27, 1999. 18 Education. Business Week, January 10.
14
Bourgault, J.; Charih, M. and Maltais, D. (2008). Hypotheses concerning the prevalence of competencies among Government executives, According to three organizational variables, Public Personal Management, 35(2), 88-114.
15
Boyden, K. M. (2000). Development of new faculty in higher education. Journal of Professional Nurslng, 16 (2), 104-111.
16
Buczynski, S. and Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 599-607.
17
Chhokar, K. B. (2010). Higher education and curriculum innovation for sustainable development in India, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11( 2), 141-152.
18
Clandinin. J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
19
Dee, J. R. and Daly, C. J. (2009). Innovative models for organizing faculty development programs pedagogical reflexivity, student learning empathy and faculty agency human resource. Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 6(1): 1-22.
20
Fairbanks, C. M. and LaGrone, D. (2006). Learning together: Constructing knowledge in a teacher research group. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 7-25.
21
Fielder, A. (2010). Elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward professional development: A grounded theory study. Ed. D. 3417235, University of Phoenix, United States- Arizona. Retrieved fromhttp://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=2113780421&Fmt=7&clientId=46440&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
22
Garcıa L. M. and Roblin, N. P. (2008). Innovation, research and professional development in higher education: Learning from our own experience, Teaching and Teacher Education: 24, 104–116.
23
Garet, M. S.; Porter, A. C.; Desimone, L.; Birman, B. F. and Yoon, K. S.(2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teaches. American Educational Research Journal.38 (4): 915-954.
24
Guskey, T. R. (2009). Closing the knowledge gap on effective professional development. Educational Horizons, 87(4), 224-233.
25
Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership.3(3), 32-42.
26
Harris, J.; Cale. L. and Musson. H. (2011). The effects of a professional development programme on primary school teachers’ perceptions of physical education. Professional Development in Education. 37 (2), 291-305.
27
Ingvarson, L.; Meiers, M. and Beavis, A.(2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 310-319.
28
Kelchtermans, G. (2010). Narratives and biography in teacher education. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, and P. Peterson (Eds.). International encyclopedia of education, 7, 610-614. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29
Kotsopoulos, D.; Mueller, J. and Buzza, D. (2012) Pre-service teacher research: An early acculturation into a research disposition. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 38(1), 21-36. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2012.64365.
30
Kushins, J. (2007), Case portraits of innovation in undergraduate studio art foundations curriculum. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ohio University.
31
Lerseth, K. A. (2013). Identity development among pre-service teacher candidates. A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. Iowa State University.
32
Meijer P. C.; Korthagen, F. A. and Vasalos, A. (2009). Supporting presence in teacher education: The connection between the personal and professional aspects of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Aducation; 25: 297-308.
33
Miller, M. (2009). A study of effective professional development for teacher engagement.Ed.D. 3379830, Walden University, United States -- Minnesota. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi. com/pqdweb?did=1921148491&Fmt=7&clientId=46440&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
34
Mundry, S. (2005). What experience has taught us about professional development, elementary and secondary education, U. S. Department of Education, www. math science net work. org.
35
Nigholls, G. (2000). Professional development, teaching and life long learning: the implication for higher education. International Journals of Life Long Education; 19 (4): 370-377.
36
Ninlawan, G. (2017). Factors which affect teachers’ professional development in teaching innovation and educational technology in the 21st. procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 197, 1732-1735.
37
Peeco, S. (2009). Acceptation of educational innovation, Journal of vocational behavior, 48: 275-300.
38
Psifidou, I. (2009). Innovation in school curriculum: the shift to learning outcomes. Proscenia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2436–2440.
39
Randi, J. and Zeichner, K. M. (2004). New visions of teacher professional development. In M.A. Smylie and D.Miretzky(Ed), Developing the teacher workforce(pp.180-227). Chicago, Illinois: National Society for the study of Education.
40
Richter, D.; Kunter, M.; Klusmann, U.; Lüdtke, O. and Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 116-126.
41
Rollins, D. H. (2003). Designing powerful professional development: for teachers, administrators and school leaders. North Carolina: Public Schools of North Carolina.
42
Sasidhar, P. V. K. and Ban, Van Den, Anne W.( 2006). Management, entrepreneurship and private service orientation: A framework for undergraduate veterinary education. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 12(3): 201-211.
43
Scott, C. and Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotions and change during professional development for teachers. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3 (2), 151-171.
44
Sedova, K.; Sedlacek, M. and Svaricek, M. (2016). Teacher professional development as means of transforming student classroom talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 14–25.
45
Selvi, K. (2010). Teacher Competencies. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, VII(1): 167-175.
46
Smith, D. (2012). Supporting new teacher development using narrative-based professional learning. Reflective Practice, 13(1), 149- 165.University Pres.
47
Soreide, G. E. (2006). Narrative construction of teacher identity: positioning and negotiation. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 12(5), 527-547.
48
Stanley, Christine A. (2001). The faculty development Portfolio: A framework for documenting the professional development of faculty developers. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 23-36.
49
Stark J. S.; Lowther M. A.; Sharp, S. and Arnold, G. L. (1997). Program level curriculum planning: an exploration for faculty perspectives on tow different campuses. Journal of Research in Higher Education. 1997. 38 (1). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/pss/40196236.
50
Tiraieyari, N.; Khairuddin, I.; Azimi, H. and Jegak, U. (2010). Teaching method competencies used by extensionists in transferring the good agricultural practices to malaysian farmers. Australian J. Basic and Applied Sciences,4(10): 5379-87.
51
Vila, L. E.; Pérez, P. J. and Coll-Serrano, V. (2014). Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter?. Journal of Business Research, 67 (5), 752-757.
52
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
53
Wang, S. K.; Hsu, H. Y.; Reeves, T. C. and Coster, D. C. (2014). Professional development to enhance teachers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons learned from a design-based research study. Computers & Amp; Education. 79, 101–115.
54
Watson, C. (2006). Narratives of practice and the construction of identity in teaching. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 12(5), 509-526.
55
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
An integrated model for education, research and innovation for collaboration of third generation university`s with industry
Industrial engineering training has been recognized as a tool for transferring the industrial experience into university and implementing to improve the quality of academic engineering education. This paper introduces an integrated model of collaboration between a third generation, entrepreneurial university and industry. The suggested model includes industrial visits, technical meetings, industrial engineering training, problem definition, idea generation, and innovation. The elements of this model form a network of university professors, undergraduate and graduate students, fresh graduates, postdoc researchers, domestic as well as overseas academics and industrial experts. In this model, all activities merge to some extent and each activity affects and is affected by other activities. Results of implementing the proposed model for three years in a gas plant are presented and discussed as a case study. Results indicate a better learning, transformation in curriculum of industrial training course, more effective communication between industry and academic experts, creation of more innovative ideas. Its implementation indicate more effective transfer of experiences from industry to university in an integrated platform of engineering training, research and innovation.
https://ijee.ias.ac.ir/article_75137_093f9e6dbe7d34237820a30945694b38.pdf
2018-08-23
77
92
10.22047/ijee.2018.143792.1567
engineering education
third generation university
integrated model
Innovation
gas industry
Reza
Azin
razinpgu@gmail.com
1
Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum, Gas and Petrochemical Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
آذین، رضا؛ ناطق، مهشید و عصفوری، شهریار (1393). نمودارهای فرایندی در صنایع نفت، گاز و پتروشیمی، دانشگاه خلیج فارس.
1
آییننامه اینترنشیپ شرکت ملی گاز ایران، 1386.
2
اشرفیزاده، سیدنظامالدین (1394). آسیبشناسی پژوهش در علوم و مهندسی طی دهههای اخیر در ایران، فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 17(67)، 113-127.
3
بختیارینژاد، فیروز و ناهید شیخان (1395). توسعه فناوری در کشور با بازبینی برنامه درسی رشتههای مهندسی، فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 18 (4)، 21-36.
4
توفیقی، جعفر و نسرین نورشاهی (1391). ارائه راهکارهایی برای توسعه همکاری دانشگاه و صنعت در ایران، فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 14 (56)، 75-95.
5
زاهدیزاده، پرویز؛ محمدیباغملایی، محمد؛ آذین، رضا؛ حاجیزاده، عبدالله و حیدری، عیسی (1395).بهینهسازی برج جذب در فرایند شیرینسازی گاز با استفاده از تحلیل اگزرژی، ارائه شده در همایش انرژی و صنعت پتروشیمی، 11 بهمن، عسلویه.
6
سخایی، زهرا؛ آذین، رضا؛ محمدی باغملایی، محمد؛ حیدری، عیسی و علینژادطیبی، احمد (1395). امکانسنجی دفع گازهای گلخانهای یک پالایشگاه گازی و تزریق به یک مخزن گاز میعانی نیمه تخلیه شده: مطالعات رفتار فازی، ارائه شده در همایش انرژی و صنعت پتروشیمی، 11 بهمن، عسلویه.
7
سلیمی، قاسم، آذین، رضا؛ پاکیزه، علی و مهدیه، امید (1389). در جستجوی رویکرد مدیریت دانش در محیطهای آموزشی: مطالعه موردی دانشکده فنی و مهندسی دانشگاه خلیج فارس، فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 12 (45)، 105-126.
8
گودارد، جان، (1395). پیوند دانشگاهها به رشد منطقهای: درسهایی از اتحادیه اروپا، ترجمه رضا آذین دانشگاه خلیج فارس.
9
نبی پور، ایرج (1387). اقتصاد دانایی محور، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی بوشهر.
10
نبی پور، ایرج (1392). شهر دانایی، راهنمایی برای سیاستگزاران توسعه شهری، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی بوشهر.
11
نبی پور، ایرج (1397). دانشگاه نسل سوم در انقلاب صنعتی چهارم، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی بوشهر.
12
وایسما، یوهان جی؛ اتزکوویتز، هنری و گیب، آلن (1395). دانشگاه نسل سوم و دانشگاه کارافرین، ترجمه ایرج نبی پور، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی بوشهر.
13
Hajizadeh, A.; Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, M.; Azin, R.; Osfouri, Sh. and Heydari, I. (2018). Technical and economic evaluation of flare gas recovery in a giant gas tefinery, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 131, 506-519.
14
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The study of the role of cultural intelligence on perceived environmental support and sharing of knowledge between engineering students
Aim and scope: The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of cultural intelligence and perceived environmental support in sharing engineering students of Malayer University. As well as the relationships between cultural intelligence, perceived environmental support and knowledge sharing with the demographic variables and a score of academic achievement (grade point average) is studied. Methodology: The study method is a descriptive - correlation method and the research design is a structural equation type. The statistical population of the study consisted of all engineering students of Malayer University with 810 students. The sample size was determined using Morgan table. A total of 262 students were selected randomly. The data gathering tool includes the standard questionnaire of cultural intelligence (Ang et al., 2004), Knowledge sharing questionnaire (adapted from Malas and Ainin, 2015) and the university supporting climate. Findings: The results of structural equation analysis using Lisrel structural equation software show that the direct effect of cultural intelligence on knowledge sharing (0.50) with 3.31 t statistic is positive and significant at the significant level of 0.001. The direct effect of cultural intelligence on the supportive environment (0.70) with the T 41.5 statistic is positive and significant at the significant level of 001.0. The direct effect of supportive atmosphere on knowledge sharing (0.62) with and without statistical significance was 0.001. The indirect effect of cultural intelligence on knowledge sharing with the role of supportive mediator (0.43) with T-score of 56.2 is positive and significant at the significant level.
https://ijee.ias.ac.ir/article_75135_e029254ba3f39595dc91b7720bfee905.pdf
2018-08-23
93
106
10.22047/ijee.2018.142088.1564
Share knowledge "
" cultural intelligence "
" a perceived environmental protection "
" Academic achievement "
" Engineering educatio
Abbas
Khakpour
khakpour@malayeru.ac.ir
1
Assistant Professor Malayer University
LEAD_AUTHOR
پریرخ، مهری (1385). نقش و کارکرد فرهنگ سازمانی و عامل رهبری در توسعه اشتراک دانش از نظر کتابداران مرجع کتابخانههای دانشگاهی: مطالعه موردی. مطالعات تربیتی و روانشناسی (ویژهنامه کتابداری)، 7(1) : 127-105
1
سلیمانپور قرابقلو، سمیرا؛ فرجپهلو، عبدالحسین و حیدری، غلامرضا (1395). اشتراک دانش و عوامل مؤثر بر آن در میان دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز در سال تحصیلی 94- 93. مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات، 23(18): 44-19
2
مانیان، امیر؛ میرا، سیدابوالقاسم و کریمی، احسان (1390). بررسی شاخصهای مؤثر بر تسهیم دانش در میان دانشجویان دورههای آموزش الکترونیکی (مطالعه موردی: مرکز آموزشهای الکترونیکی دانشگاه تهران، پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات. ۲۷ (۱) :۴۷-۶۵
3
مرزوقی، رحمتاله؛ محمدی، مهدی و کشاورزی، فهیمه (1393). ارائه الگوی علّی کیفیت محیط دانشگاه، تسهیم دانش و عملکرد تحصیلی دانشجویان علوم پزشکی دانشگاه شیراز. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، ۱۴ (۸) :۷۰۴-۷۱۴
4
Ang, S.; Van Dyne, L.; Koh, C.; Ng, K. Y.; Templer, K. J.; Tay, C.; and Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335-371.
5
Chen, M. L. and Lin, C. P. (2013). Assessing the effects of cultural intelligence on team knowledge sharing from a sociocognitive perspective. Human Resource Management, 52(5), 675-695.
6
Chen, Z.; Deng, S.; Mamtimin, A.; Chang, J.; Liu, F. and Ma, L. (2017). Exploring factors influencing knowledge sharing of international students at chinese university. International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design (pp. 521-530). Springer, Cham.
7
Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage wht they know. Harvard Businees Press.
8
Dalkir, K. (2013). Knowledge management in theory and Practice: Routledge.
9
Earley, P. C. and Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: individual interactions across cultures: Stanford University Press.
10
Eid, M. and Nuhu, N. A. (2011). Impact of learning culture and information technology use on knowledge sharing of Saudi students. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(1), 48-57.
11
Ergün, G. and Güzel, A. (2017). Reviewing the relation between the automatic thought patterns of university students and their levels of cultural intelligence. European Psychiatry, 41, S901.
12
Jer Yuen, T. and Shaheen Majid, M. (2007). Knowledge-sharing patterns of undergraduate students in Singapore. Library Review, 56(6), 485-494.
13
Kakar, A. K. (2018). How do team conflicts impact knowledge sharing? Knowledge Management
14
Research & Practice, 16(1), 21-31.
15
Kim, J.; Lee, C. and Elias, T. (2015). Factors affecting information sharing in social networking sites amongst university students: Application of the knowledge-sharing model to social networking sites. Online Information Review, 39(3), 290-309.
16
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Second Edition, New York: The Guilford Press.
17
Lopez, S. P.; Peon, J. M. M. and Ordas, C. J.V. (2004). Managing knowledge: The link between culture and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8: 93–104.
18
Mallasi, H. and Ainin, S. (2015). Investigating knowledge sharing behaviour in academic environment. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, c1-20.
19
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H.(1995). The knowledge creation company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation.
20
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548-571.
21
Ramirez, A. (2010). Impact of cultural intelligence level on conflict resolution ability: A conceptual model and research proposal. Emerging Leadership Journal, 3(1), 42-56.
22
Riege, A. (2005). Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 18-35.
23
Roux, P. W.; Suzuki, K.; Matsuba, R. and Goda, Y. (2018). Developing cultural intelligence (CQ): Designs for Blended Learning. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 12(1), 18-28.
24
Shannon, L. M. and Begley, T. M. (2008). Antecedents of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence. Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications, 41-55.
25
Stoermer, S.; Davies, S. and Froese, F. J. (2017). Expatriates’ cultural intelligence, embeddedness and knowledge sharing: A multilevel analysis. in academy of management proceedings Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. V. 2017, (1),16294.
26
Tan, B. I.; Wong, C. H.; Lam, C. H.; Ooi, K. B. and Ng, F. C. Y. (2010). Assessing the link between service quality dimensions and knowledge sharing: Student perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 4(6), 1014.
27
Twum-Darko, M. and Harker, L. A. L. (2015). Factors influencing knowledge sharing amongst higher education academics at a university in South Africa. Journal of Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(2), 280-292.
28
Xue, Y.; Bradley, J. and Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 299-312.
29
Yaghi, K.; Barakat, S.; Alfawaer, Z. M.; Shkokani, M. and Nassuora, A. (2011). Knowledge sharing degree among the undergraduate students: a case study at applied science private university. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 20-24.
30
Yeh, Y. C.; Yeh, Y. L. and Chen, Y. H. (2012). From knowledge sharing to knowledge creation: A blended knowledge-management model for improving university students’ creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 245-257.
31
Zaqout, F. and Abbas, M. (2012). Towards a model for understanding the influence of the factors that stimulate university students’ engagement and performance in knowledge sharing. Library Review, 61(5), 345-361.
32