DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRY – BASED ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY AMONG ENGINEERING STUDENTS: A THEORY GENERATING META-SYNTHESIS APPROAC

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Scool of Education and Sychology, Shiraz University

2 Shiraz University

3 Shiraz University- Faculty of Education and Psychology- Department of Educational Administration and Planning

10.22047/ijee.2025.535362.2197
Abstract
The aim of this research was to design a model for developing an industry-based online community of inquiry model among undergraduate engineering students in the higher education system. The qualitative research design and its research method were theory-building metasynthesis. Accordingly, in the first step, after presenting the research question, the members of the metasynthesis team were identified. In the second and third steps, reliable Latin and Persian sources were determined and the inclusion criteria for articles were determined. After passing through the screening stages, finally, 32 relevant articles were selected. By analyzing the data, 46 open codes were first extracted and then these codes formed a classification and model for the development of industry-based exploration circles in engineering students within the framework of antecedents of the development of industry-based exploration circles (such as dynamic learning environment, multifaceted educational materials, and ...), processes of the development of industry-based exploration circles (such as active interactions between learners, active examination of relationships between students in line with participation by professors and ...), and consequences of the development of industry-based exploration circles (such as transforming students into lifelong learners, developing practical skills of engineering students and ...). Based on the findings of this study, professors, aware of the antecedents, processes, and consequences of the development of the exploration circle, will apply new approaches to teaching and will strive to train capable graduates with a strong sense of self-efficacy, familiar with industry issues.

Keywords

Subjects

Anderson, T. (2017). How communities of inquiry drive teaching and learning in the digital age. Contact North. https://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/e%20newsletters/how_communities_of_inquiry_drive_teaching_and_learning_in_the_digital.pdf
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136.
Bates, A. W. (2018). 2018 review of online learning: open pedagogy. Tony Bates. https://www.tonybates.ca/2018/12/26/2018-review-of-online-learning-open-pedagogy/
Baytiyeh, H. (2018). Progreen online engineering diploma in the Middle East: Assessment of the educational experience. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(2), 264-277.
Befus, M. (2016). Conducting a multivocal thematic synthesis on an extensive body of literature. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27463
Beneroso, D., & Robinson, J. (2022). Online project-based learning in engineering design: Supporting the acquisition of design skills. Education for Chemical Engineers, 38, 38-47.
Caird, S., & Roy, R. (2019). Blended learning and sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education (pp. 107-116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_107.
Carroll, N., Lang, M., & Connolly, C. (2024). An extended community of inquiry framework supporting students in online and digital education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-17.
Caskurlu, S., Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Kozan, K. (2021). The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 165, 104111.
Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends, 64(4), 557-560.
hodzi, D. T., & Matobobo, C. (2021, April). An exploration of the efficacy of project-based assessment as a tool to promote basic research skills at undergraduate level in South African rural universities. In 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 808-813). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9454029
Cooper, T., & Scriven, R. (2017). Communities of inquiry in curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths and limitations in context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4).
Corbett, C. F., Wright, P. J., Donevant, S. B., Wickersham, K. E., Raynor, P. A., Vick, L. L., ... & Andrews, J. O. (2023). Next generation nurse scientists: A systems approach to engaging undergraduate students in research. Nursing Outlook, 71(6), 102054.
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., ... & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1-20.https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Douglas, K. A., Johnston, A. C., Martin, J. P., Short, T., & Soto-Pérez, R. A. (2022). How engineering instructors supported students during emergency remote instruction: A case comparison. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(3), 934-955 https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22495
Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2018). A Guide to qualitative meta-synthesis (Vol. 2). New York, NY, USA:: Routledge.
Garrison, D. R. (2010). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In Encyclopedia of distance learning, Second edition (pp. 352-355). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.‌
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, 2(2-3), 87-105.Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9.
Guo, B. H., Milke, M., & Jin, R. (2022). Civil engineering students’ perceptions of emergency remote teaching: a case study in New Zealand. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(4), 679-696.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2031896
Hodzi, M. B., Annor, F., & Darkwah, E. (2021). An exploration of work-related experiences of domestic workers in Accra, Ghana. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 36(4), 309-334.
Homer, D. (2022). Mature students’ experience: A community of inquiry study during a COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 28(2), 333-353.
Huang, Y. C., Backman, S. J., Backman, K. F., McGuire, F. A., & Moore, D. (2019). An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: a self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 591-611.
Jaksic, N. I. (2021, July). Pair-to-Pair Peer Learning: Comparative Analysis of Face-to-Face and Online Laboratory Experiences. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.‌https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-37556
Jaschik, S., & Lederman, D. (2019). Survey of faculty attitudes on technology. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/files/media/IHE_2019_Faculty_Tech_Survey_20191030.pdf
Jiang, M., & Koo, K. (2020). Emotional presence in building an online learning community among non-traditional graduate students. Online Learning, 24(4), 93.‌
Johnson, N. (2019). National Survey of Online and Digital Learning 2019. Canadian Digital Learning Research Association. (PDF). https://www.cdlra-acrfl.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2019_national_en.pdf
Kim, G. C., & Gurvitch, R. (2020). Online education research adopting the community of inquiry framework: A systematic review. Quest, 72(4), 395-409.
Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Hatala, M., & Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74-89.‌
Kozan, K., & Caskurlu, S. (2018). On the Nth presence for the Community of Inquiry framework. Computers & Education, 122, 104-118.‌
Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007
Lakhal, S., Mukamurera, J., Bédard, M. E., Heilporn, G., & Chauret, M. (2020). Features fostering academic and social integration in blended synchronous courses in graduate programs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 5.‌
Lau, Y. Y., Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Vyas, L., Sandoval-Hernandez, A., & Wong, S. (2021). COVID-19 crisis: exploring community of inquiry in online learning for sub-degree students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 679197.‌
Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12.‌
Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2022). Considering how disciplinary differences matter for successful online learning through the Community of Inquiry lens. Computers & Education, 187, 104551.‌
Miller, C. T., Drewery, M., Waliczek, T. M., Contreras, R. N., & Kubota, C. (2023). Engaging undergraduate students in research. HortTechnology, 33(1), 1-7.‌
Morrison, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2023). The role of feedback in building teaching presence and student self-regulation in online learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100503.‌
Nazar, H., Omer, U., Nazar, Z., & Husband, A. (2019). A study to investigate the impact of a blended learning teaching approach to teach pharmacy law. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 27(3), 303-310.‌
Nihlawi, R., El-Baz, H., & Gunn, C. (2018). Engineering students’ perceptions of flipped learning: Benefits, challenges and recommendations. 2018 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.‌
OECD. (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/handbookforinnovativelearning.htm
OECD. (2019). How’s life in the digital age? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311800-en
Padayachee, P., & Campbell, A. L. (2022). Supporting a mathematics community of inquiry through online discussion forums: towards design principles. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 35-63.‌
Parrish, C. W., Guffey, S. K., Williams, D. S., Estis, J. M., & Lewis, D. (2021). Fostering cognitive presence, social presence and teaching presence with integrated online-team-based learning. TechTrends, 65(4), 473-484.‌
Purwandari, E. P., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2022). Exploring e-learning community of inquiry framework for engineering education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 619-632.‌
Rachmawati, T. S. N., Priadi, C. R., Sagitaningrum, F. H., Swantika, B., Mairizal, A. Q., Abdillah, A., ... & Junus, K. (2020, April). Comparison of online group discussion and class discussion learning for a soil mechanics class. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 830, No. 3, p. 032056). IOP Publishing.‌
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701.‌
Rutz, E., & Ehrlich, S. (2016, June). Increasing learner engagement in online learning through use of interactive feedback: Results of a pilot study. 2016 ASEE annual conference & exposition.‌
Sandelowski, M., Sandelowski, M. J., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company.
Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22-32.‌
Williams, L. S. (2017). The managed heart: Adult learners and emotional presence online. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 124-131.‌
Williams-Dobosz, D., Azevedo, R. F. L., Jeng, A., Thakkar, V., Bhat, S., Bosch, N., & Perry, M. (2021, April). A social network analysis of online engagement for college students traditionally underrepresented in STEM. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 207-215).‌
World Economic Forum. (2020). The rise of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. World Economic Forum (web article). https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning
Yu, Z., & Li, M. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of Community of Inquiry in online learning contexts over twenty-five years. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11669-11688.‌
Zvobgo, K., Pickering, P. M., Settle, J. E., & Tierney, M. J. (2023). Creating New Knowledge with Undergraduate Students: Institutional Incentives and Faculty Agency. PS: Political Science & Politics, 56(4), 512-518.‌ Zvobgo Zvobgo

  • Receive Date 24 August 2025
  • Revise Date 20 October 2025
  • Accept Date 20 October 2025
  • First Publish Date 20 October 2025
  • Publish Date 20 February 2026