Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 Virtual Education Expert

2 Professor of Educational Administration - Educational Administration Faculty of Management

3 Assistant Professor of Educational Administration Faculty of Management

4 Professor of Educational Administration Faculty of Management

Abstract

One of the important categories in education is the process of teaching and learning. All educational activities are to lay the right foundation for the realization of this process. This study aimed to identify the components affecting the teaching-learning process for the training of efficient engineering technical students with high employability. In this research, a qualitative approach and content analysis method were used. The study participants were purposefully selected and a semi-structured interview was conducted with 15 informants’ people who had lived experience in engineering education. Also, the documents of 11 universities and colleges active in engineering education with high employability were analyzed. Results includes 6 categories or domain : Teaching method, with 16 subcategories or dimension; Curriculum with 8 subcategories; Characteristics of the teacher and how to communicate with the student with 11 subcategories; Evaluation with 3 subcategories; Strengthening skills and characteristics that should be considered in the classroom with 13 subcategories; Learning support services with 14 subcategories. This study showed that several factors affect the effectiveness of teaching-learning process that should be considered by policy makers. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

ABET. (2017). Engineering change: Lessons from leaders on modernizing higher education engineering curriculum. https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ABET_Engineering_Issue-Brief_final_web.pdf.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405.
Bameri, M, salimi, G, Marzooqi R, Safavi, SAli &  Mohammadi, M. (2023). “Competencies of engineering students and equirements of universities and higher education centers to adapt to Industry 4.0: A study based on the meta-synthesis” Iranian Journal of Engineering Education 24(96): 1-30. doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2022.352365.1930 [in Persian].
Barna, B., & Fodor, S. (2018). An empirical study on the use of gamification on IT courses at higher education. Teaching and Learning in a Digital World: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning-Volume 1.
Bazelais, P. and T. Doleck (2018). “Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study of college mechanics courses.” Education and Information Technologies 23: 2889-2900.
Beagon, U., Kövesi, K., Tabas, B., Nørgaard, B., Lehtinen, R., Bowe, B., Spliid, C. M. (2022). Preparing engineering students for the challenges of the SDGs: what competences are required? European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-23.
Board, N. S. (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. NS Foundation (Ed.). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? In (Vol. 9, pp. 1-29): Taylor & Francis.
Capitol. (2021). Builder Culture America, Capitol technology university. Capitol technology university. https://www.captechu.edu/student-experience/builder-culture.
Chiru, C., et al. (2012). “A cross country study on university graduates key competencies. An employer‘s perspective.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 46: 4258-4262.
EghtesadOnline. (2018). 2-digit unemployment rate in engineering. EghtesadOnline. 
Grosemans, I., Coertjens, L., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Exploring learning and fit in the transition from higher education to the labour market: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 21, 67-84.
Haj Hosseini, M. (2016). “The effectiveness of Socratic’s teaching on the tendency to critical thinking..” Journal of Applied Psychological Research 6(4): 59-78.
Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9 (4), 276.
Hojjati, S., Yarmohammadian, M., & Keshtiari, N. (2017). Design an appropriate model for studying development evaluation of technical and engineering based on the lived experiences of teachers and students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 8(30), 321-338. [in Persian].
Holley, E. A. (2017). Engaging engineering students in geoscience through case studies and active learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(3), 240-249.
Holley, E. A. (2017). Engaging engineering students in geoscience through case studies and active learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(3), 240-249.
Iran, S. C. o. (2020). Summary of the results of the workforce statistics plan. https://amar.org.ir/Portals/0/News/1399/bikari%20bahar99-2.pdf?ver=qu-ZsPa5rVRaQe2ZS_wU7w%3D%3D. Iran, Statistical Centre of Iran.
 Iran, S. C. o. (2018). Summary of the results of the workforce statistics plan, https://www.amar.org.ir/Portals/0/News/1397/nirooye%20kar1-97.pdf.
IRNA. (2017). The main challenges of Iran’s economy. IRNA. https://www.irna.ir/news/82676350.
HezarJaribi, J, & Sobhani, B. (2018). Youth Employment Policies Strategy in Iran. Strategic Studies On Youth and Sports, 17(41), 29-48. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1959325.
Kheradmandinia, S., & Sotudeh Gharebagh, R. (2018). Complementary skill educations for chemical engineers from engineering consultant company’s view perspective. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 20 (77), 1-17. [in Persian].
Kim, M. K., et al. (2014). “The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles.” The Internet and Higher Education 22: 37-50.
Kinoshita, T. J., Knight, D. B., & Gibbes, B. (2017). The positive influence of active learning in a lecture hall: An analysis of normalised gain scores in introductory environmental engineering. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54 (3), 275-284.
Lambrechts, W., et al. (2019). “The role of individual sustainability competences in eco-design building projects.” Journal of Cleaner Production 208: 1631-1641.
Lavasani, M. G., et al. (2017). “A Structural Model of the Relationship between Basic psychological Needs, Academic Motivation and English Academic Engagement.” Educational Psychology 13(43): 35-58.
Lima, R. M., et al. (2017). “Active Learning in Engineering Education: a introduction.” European Journal of Engineering Education 42(1): 1-4.
Memarian, H. (2020). Design of Master of Engineering Education Program. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 22(85), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2020.199311.1672 [in Persian].
Memarian, H. (2020). Design of Master of Engineering Education Program. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 22(85), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2020.199311.1672 [in Persian].
MIT. (2021). MIT https://www.mit.edu/education.
Najafi, H. (2021). “Investigating the relationship between superficial and in-depth study approaches With self-centered learning skills.” Quarterly Journal of Transcendent Education 1(1): 1-9. [in Persian].
NCES. (2020). Employment Outcomes of Bachelor’s Degree Holders. National Center for Education Statistics https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/sbc/bachelor-degree-holder-outcomes.
Olin. (2021). https://olin.smartcatalogiq.com/2018-19/Student-Handbook/The-Learning-Continuum/Olin-College-core-personal-values.
Ornellas, A., Falkner, K., & Edman Stålbrandt, E. (2019). Enhancing graduates’ employability skills through authentic learning approaches. Higher education, skills and work-based learning, 9(1), 107-120.
Reeves, T. D., Marbach-Ad, G., Miller, K. R., Ridgway, J., Gardner, G. E., Schussler, E. E., & Wischusen, E. W. (2016). A conceptual framework for graduate teaching assistant professional development evaluation and research. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(2), es2.
Rhodes, M. G. (2019). “Metacognition.” Teaching of Psychology 46(2): 168-175.
Rooshani, F., Ehsan, S., Amirhosseini, D., & Hamidi, M. (2021). The Employability Capabilities of the Graduates of the Universities Based on Grounded Theory. Studies, 11(22), 291-334.
Rose-Hulman. (2021). Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. https://www.rose-hulman.edu.
SUTD. (2021). Singapore University of Technology and Design. Singapore University of Technology and Design. https://entrepreneurship.sutd.edu.sg/about-us.
UCLA. (2021). https://doi.org/https://www.ucla.edu/about.
WPI. (2021). Academics https://www.wpi.edu/academics.
Zarghami, H., et al. (2022). “It is obvious that students who have developed high levels of skills required by the labor market are welcomed by employers to accompany them in their organizations..” Iranian Journal of Engineering Education 23(92): 7-34. [in Persian].
Zeeshan, M., Idrees, H., & Siddique, N. (2020). Information literacy skills among students of Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS). Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-15.
Zohoor, H., et al. (2020). “Status analysis of engineering sciences in the country for future consideration: A summary of studies of specific groups, The IR Iran Academy of Sciences.” Iranian Journal of Engineering Education 21(84): 85-101. [in Persian].