IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM BY COMBINING GLOBAL, LOCAL AND FUTURE-ORIENTED PERSPECTIVES

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Author

University Blv.

Abstract
The mechanical engineering curriculum, at both the undergraduate and postgraduate levels, has been revised twice in the last decade. Despite these updates, its core foundation remains based on older models. While there have been some minor adjustments, such as adding or removing a few courses, these changes don not keep pace with the rapid advancements seen globally. The present paper conducts a comparative analysis of the new mechanical engineering curriculum with those of four foreign universities. It identifies deficiencies and discrepancies in meeting the current needs of the engineering community within the country and anticipation of future developments. Additionally, the article provides practical recommendations aimed at improving the efficiency and modernization of the curriculum. These recommendations span various areas, including general enhancements, changes in titles, addressing existing shortcomings, and advocating for a revamped approval process for disciplinary curricula. Importantly, the most important shortcoming in the curriculum is ignoring design concepts and engineering principles.  The suggestions can  be implemented for other engineering disciplines.

Keywords

Subjects

ABET, 2024. Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2008. 2028 Vision for Mechanical Engineering.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2011. Mechanical Engineering- the state of mechanical engineering: today and beyond.
Bahri, K., Sameri, M., & Abdolisoltanahmadi, J. (2018). A study of the challenges of electrical engineering curriculum for its revision and modernization. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 79, 1-25 [in Persian].
College of New Jersey, 2024. Retrieved from https://mechanicalengineering.tcnj.edu/.
Davami, P. (2016). What subjects are missing in engineering universities? Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 72, 1-21 [in Persian].
Fayyaz, J. (2023). Challenges of higher education in engineering fields. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 129-143 [in Persian].
Ghaffari, MM., & Zohor H. (2014). The global perspective of challenges of engineering research and education for sustainable development. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 63, 11-24 [in Persian].
Iran’s Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, 2021. Monitoring the employment status of university graduates [in Persian].
Memarian, H. (2011). Deficiencies of Iran’s engineering education programs. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 51, 53-74 [in Persian].
Memarian, H. (2013). Revaluation of engineering education. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 57, 1-18 [in Persian].
Moghaddas, J.S., Yasrebi, N., Shojaossadati, A., & Taghavi, M. (2019). Study and comparison of curriculum and methodology of chemical engineering in American and Iranian universities. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 81, 25-45 [in Persian].
New Mexico Tech, 2024. Retrieved from https://www.nmt.edu/.
Perdue university, 2024. Retrieved from https://www.purdue.edu/.
Times Higher Education, 2024. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/.
University of Vermont, 2024. Retrieved from https://www.uvm.edu/.

  • Receive Date 06 May 2024
  • Revise Date 27 June 2024
  • Accept Date 30 June 2024
  • First Publish Date 30 June 2024
  • Publish Date 18 September 2024