پاسخگویی به نیازهای صنعت امروز از طریق بروزرسانی برنامه درسی مهندسی مکانیک با استفاده از استقرار تابع کیفیت دومرحله ‏ای

نوع مقاله : یادداشت پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی مرکز آموزش مهارتهای مهندسی ، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف ، تهران، ایران

2 عضو هیئت علمی مرکز آموزش مهارتهای مهندسی، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران

چکیده
 امروزه تأمین نیازهای صنعت، نقش برجسته ای در پیشرفت و قدرت رقابتی هر کشور دارد. بنابراین، لازم است برنامه درسی رشته ‏های مهندسی که در دانشگاه‏ های آن کشور اجرا می ‏شود، با این نیازها هم‏سو شود. این پژوهش متمرکز بر برنامه درسی رشته مهندسی مکانیک، به ویژه در دانشگاه‏ های ایران است. بدین منظور، ابتدا با نظرسنجی از صاحبان صنایع و بررسی ادبیات موضوع، این نیازها شناسایی و اولویت ‏بندی شده ‏اند. بر این اساس، مهم‏ترین این نیازها خلاقیت، توانایی تجسم، آشنایی با فرایندهای ساخت و چابکی در یادگیری مفاهیم جدید هستند. در فاز بعدی، با استفاده از یک روش استقرار تابع کیفیت دومرحله‏ ای (Quality Function Deployment, QFD)، این نیازها به مشخصات برنامه درسی تبدیل شده ‏اند. نتایج نشان می‏ دهند که مؤثرترین گروه ‏های دروس در این زمینه، دروس انتخابی، دروس مهارتی مانند گرافیک مهندسی (شامل دروس رسم فنی و نقشه‏ کشی)، طراحی اجزای ماشین و کارگاه ‏های عملی هستند که برخی از آنها در برنامه‏ های موجود و در مقایسه با دروس تئوری تخصصی و دروس پایه، از نظر کمی و کیفی کمتر مورد توجه جدی قرار گرفته ‏اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

SATISFYING THE DEMANDS OF TODAY’S INDUSTRY THROUGH UPDATING THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM USING A TWO-STEP QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT

نویسندگان English

Hamid Haghshenas Gorgani 1
Alireza Jahantigh Pak 2
1 Engineering Skills Education Center, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Engineering Skills Education Center, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Meeting the needs of today’s industry plays a prominent role in the progress and competitive strength of any country. Therefore, it is necessary to align the curriculum of engineering courses with them. In this research, the focus has been on the mechanical engineering curriculum, especially in the universities of Iran. For this purpose, first by surveying the industry owners and reviewing the literature, these expectations have been identified and prioritized. Accordingly, the most important of these needs are creativity, visualization ability, familiarity with manufacturing processes, and agility in learning new concepts. Then, using a two-stage quality function deployment method (QFD), these expectations are translated into curriculum specifications. The results show that the most effective groups of courses in this field are elective courses, skill courses such as engineering graphics (including technical drawing and drawing courses), design of machine components, and practical workshops. In the existing programs, compared to courses in specialized theory and basic courses, some of them have received less considerable attention in quantity and quality.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Mechanical engineering curriculum
industry demands
QFD
AlMaian, R. (2017). A preliminary research to improve the creativity of engineering education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rabat, Morocco. 
Assiddiqi, M., & Vanany, I. (2021). QFD applications for quality improvements online student learning. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
Eppes, T., Milanovic, I., Jamshidi, R., & Shetty, D. (2021). Engineering curriculum in support of industry 4.0. 
Ginting, R., Ishak, A., & Pitaloka, D. (2020). Application of quality function deployment (QFD) method in meeting customer satisfaction in the bookshelf industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
Gorgani, H. H., & Shabani, S. (2021). Online exams and the COVID-19 pandemic: a hybrid modified FMEA, QFD, and k-means approach to enhance fairness. SN Applied Sciences, 3, 1-18. 
Haghshenas Gorgani, H., & Jahantigh Pak, A. (2020). Adaptation of engineering graphics courses to modern design approaches using a hybrid data mining method based on qfd and fuzzy demate. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 22(86), 55-83. 
Haghshenas Gorgani, H., & Jahantigh Pak, A. (2020). Identification of factors affecting quality of teaching engineering drawing using a hybrid MCDM model. Journal of AI and Data Mining, 8(2), 247-267. 
Haghshenas Gorgani, H., & Jahantigh Pak, A. (2020). Adaptation of engineering graphics courses to modern design approaches using a hybrid data mining method based on qfd and fuzzy demate. Iranian Journal of Engineering education, 22(86), 55-83. doi: 10.22047/ijee.2020.212668.1708.
Haghshenas Gorgani, H., Jahantigh Pak, A., Haerizadeh Nabavi, A., & Shabani, S. (2022). Providing a systematic preventive approach to reduce the adverse effects of online university education during the covid-19 pandemic. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 24(94), 133-156. doi: 10.22047/ijee.2022.324478.1882.
Haghshenas Gorgani, H., Jahazi, A., Jahantigh Pak, A., & Shabani, S. (2023). A hybrid algorithm for adjusting the input parameters of the wirecut EDM machine in order to obtain maximum customer satisfaction. SN Applied Sciences, 5(1), 37. 
kaboli, S., Nasiri, S., Haghshenas Gorgani, H., Mottaghipour, M., Jahantigh Pak, A., Pircheraghi, G., & Arghavani Hadi, J. (2022). General workshop: A course for practical training or an introduction to engineering. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 24(94), 23-38. doi: 10.22047/ijee.2022.325828.1885.
Kuimova, M., Burleigh, D., & Rodionov, D. (2017). Creativity in engineering education. Ponte, 73(2), 82-86. 
Liu, Q., Mei, D., & Yu, G. (2020). Curriculum system optimization based on integration of enterprises and universities using qfd under the background of engineering education professional certification. International Conference on Modern Educational Technology and Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ICMETIE 2020).
Lizarelli, F. L., Osiro, L., Ganga, G. M., Mendes, G. H., & Paz, G. R. (2021). Integration of SERVQUAL, analytical Kano, and QFD using fuzzy approaches to support improvement decisions in an entrepreneurial education service. Applied Soft Computing, 112, 107786. 
Luxhosj, J. T., & Hansen, P. H. (1996). Engineering curriculum reform at Aalborg university. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(3), 183-186. 
Prados, J. W. (1998). Engineering education in the United States: past, present, and future. 
Siow, Y., Szwalek, J., Komperda, J., Darabi, H., & Mashayek, F. (2019). A critical look at mechanical engineering curriculum: Assessing the need. 
Tolman, S., & Jensen, M. J. (2023). Design across the curriculum: Improving design instruction in a mechanical engineering program. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Tyler Carter Kreipke, C., & Meyers, K. (2023). Development of student comfort with various fabrication methods in aerospace and mechanical engineering design curriculum. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

  • تاریخ دریافت 16 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 03 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 21 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 21 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 شهریور 1403