نظام آموزش نسل چهار: شناسایی فناوری‏ های نوین و امکان سنجی پیاده‌سازی آن در دانشگاه‌های کشور

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 فارغ التحصیل کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار دانشکده مهندسی صنایع دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، اصفهان،ایران

3 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران، ایران

4 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد رشته مدیریت، دانشگاه امین، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
جهان امروز در حال تجربه یک موج تغییر با فناوری‏ های دیجیتال و تغییرات فن‏آورانه است که روندها را تعیین می‏ کنند و بر هر جنبه‏ ای از زندگی تأثیر می گذارد، فناوری‌های جدید زندگی انسان را به طرق مختلف بهبود می‏ بخشد. برای همگام شدن با این موج تغییر، باید نظام آموزشی کشور را به‏ روز کرد تا این تغییرات از سنین پایین‏ تر در اولویت قرار گیرد. این شامل ادغام فناوری‏ ها در سرفصل آموزشی و پرورش یک محیط یادگیری است تا نوآوری و حل مسئله را تشویق کند و از آن به‌عنوان آموزش 0/4 یاد می‌شود. هدف از این مقاله شناسایی فناوری‌هایی که لازمه‌ی پیاده‌سازی آموزش 0/4 است، می‌باشد و پس از شناسایی بررسی می‌کند که آیا مراکز آموزش عالی امکان پیاده‌سازی این فناوری‌ها را دارد یا خیر؟. برای دستیابی به این هدف بیش از 70 مقاله منتشر شده لاتین موردمطالعه قرار گرفت. با توجه به هدف تحقیق، روش تحقیق آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) برای انجام تحقیق مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. این پژوهش از منظر هدف کاربردی، از نظر ماهیت توصیفی-پیمایشی و شیوه گردآوری داده‏ ها اسنادی-کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی می ‏باشد. پس از بررسی کامل مقالات تعداد 27 مضمون پایه شناسایی شد که در 7 دسته مضمون سازمان دهنده‌ی: 1-فناوری‌های ارتباطی و شبکه، 2- محتوای تعاملی، 3- فناوری‏های مبتنی برهوش مصنوعی، 4-فناوری ‏های آموزشی، یادگیری و تعاملی 5-  فناوری‏ های دیجیتال، 6- فناوری‏ های واقعیت و شبیه‏ سازی، 7- فناوری نوآورانه قرار گرفت و در نهایت مضامین سازمان دهنده در 2 دسته‌بندی فراگیر،1- فناوری‏های ارتباطی و آموزشی و 2- فناوری‏های نوین و هوش مصنوعی قرار گرفتند. پس از تهیه و توزیع پرسشنامه، باتحلیل داده‌های بدست آمده از 6 دانشگاه کشور جهت امکان سنجی پیاده‌سازی این فناوری‌ها نتیجه شد که دانشگاه‌ها آمادگی لازم جهت تهیه و بکارگیری فناوری‌های مرتبط با نظام آموزش نسل 0/4 را ندارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

THE FOURTH GENERATION EDUCATION SYSTEM: IDENTIFYING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTATION IN THE COUNTRY’S UNIVERSITIES

نویسندگان English

Mohammadsaber Shahrestani 1
Hosein Vahidi 2
Afshin Alipour pijani 3
Hamidreza Nabavinezhad 4
1 Master student of Malik Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Malik Ashtar University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Industrial Engineering, Malik Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
4 Master's degree in Management, Amin University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Today’s world is experiencing a wave of change driven by digital tech life. The new technologies enhances human life in various ways. To keep pace with this wave of change, it is necessary to update the educational system of the country so that these changes are prioritized from an early age. This includes integrating technologies into the curriculum and fostering a learning environment that technologies and technological advancements that are shaping trends and impacting every aspect of encourages innovation and problem-solving, referred to as 4/0 education. The aim of this article is to identify the technologies necessary for implementing 4/0 education and to examine whether higher education institutions have the capacity to implement these technologies. To achieve this goal, over 70 published Latin articles were studied. Given the research objective, a mixed-methods approach (qualitative-quantitative) was utilized. This study is applied in terms of purpose, descriptive-exploratory in nature, and employs document-library and field data collection methods. After thoroughly reviewing the articles, 27 basic themes were identified, which were organized into 7 thematic categories: 1. Communication and network technologies, 2. Interactive content, 3. AI-based technologies, 4. Educational, learning, and interactive technologies, 5. Digital technologies, 6. Reality and simulation technologies, and 7. Innovative technologies. Ultimately, the organizing themes were classified into 2 overarching categories: 1. Communication and educational technologies, and 2. Innovative technologies and artificial intelligence. Following the preparation and distribution of a questionnaire, an analysis of the data obtained from 6 universities in the country revealed that these institutions do not have the necessary readiness to prepare and implement technologies related to the 4/0 generation educational system.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Education 4/0
education implementation 4/0
engineering education
educational technologies
higher education
industry 4/0
Abed Jafari, H., Taslimi, M., Faqihi, A., Sheikhzadeh, M. (2011). Content analysis and theme network: a simple and efficient way to explain patterns in qualitative data. Strategic Management Thought,  5(2), 151-198.
Akimov, N., Kurmanov, N., Uskelenova, A., Aidargaliyeva, N., Mukhiyayeva, D., Rakhimova, S., & Utegenova, Z. (2023). Components of education 4.0 in open innovation competence frameworks: systematic review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100037.
Alakrash, H. M., & Razak, N. A. (2020). Towards the education 4.0, readiness level of students in utilising technology-enhanced classroom. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(10), 161-182.
Alfalah, A. A. (2023). Factors influencing students’ adoption and use of mobile learning management systems: a quantitative study of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(1), 100143.
Alharbi, A. M. (2023). Implementation of education 5.0 in developed and developing countries: a comparative study. Creative Education, 14(5), 914-942.
Almacen, R. M., Castilla, D., Gonzales, G., Gonzales, R., Costan, F., Costan, E., & Ocampo, L. (2023). Preparedness indicator system for education 4.0 with fucom and rough sets. Systems, 11(6), 288.
Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1017-1051.
Alvarez-Cedillo, J., Aguilar-Fernandez, M., Sandoval-Gomez Jr, R., & Alvarez-Sanchez, T. (2019). Actions to be taken in Mexico towards education 4.0 and society 5.0. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 693-698.
Anderson, C. R. (2023). Traditional versus modern teaching methods amongst special education students and enhancing students’ self-concept: a comprehensive literature review. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology.
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
Anggriani, A., Sarwi, S., & Masturi, M. (2020). The effectiveness of guided discovery in distance learning to improve scientific literacy competencies of primary school students. Journal of Primary Education, 9(5), 454-462.
Bakkabulindi, F. E. K. (2018). Electronic readiness of administrators in Makerere University: a test of rogers’innovation diffusion theory. Ajbuma Journal, 4(1).
Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2020). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty.
Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?. The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722.
Boltsi, A., Kalovrektis, K., Xenakis, A., Chatzimisios, P., & Chaikalis, C. (2024). Digital tools, technologies, and learning methodologies for education 4.0 frameworks: a stem oriented survey. IEEE Access, 12, 12883-12901.
Chen, Z., Zhang, J., Jiang, X., Hu, Z., Han, X., Xu, M., & Vivekananda, G. N. (2020). Education 4.0 using artificial intelligence for students performance analysis. Inteligencia Artificial, 23(66), 124-137.
Chituc, C. M. (2021). A framework for education 4.0 in digital education ecosystems. In smart and sustainable collaborative networks 4.0: 22nd IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises Proceedings 22 (pp. 702-709).
Dakhi, O., Jama, J., & Irfan, D. (2020). Blended learning: a 21st century learning model at college. International Journal of Multi Science, 1(08), 50-65.
Demartini, C., & Benussi, L. (2017). Do web 4.0 and industry 4.0 imply education x. 0?. It Professional, 19(3), 4-7.
Dhivya, D. S., Hariharasudan, A., & Nawaz, N. (2023). Unleashing potential: multimedia learning and education 4.0 in learning professional english communication. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2248751.
Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023). A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 12.
Dočekal, V., & Tulinská, H. (2015). The impact of technology on education theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3765-3771.
Ekin, C. C., Polat, E., & Hopcan, S. (2023). Drawing the big picture of games in education: a topic modeling-based review of past 55 years. Computers & Education, 194, 104700.
Erişti, S. D. B., Kurt, A. A., & Dindar, M. (2012). Teachers’ views about effective use of technology in classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3(2), 30-41.
Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the second tier. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290.
Felder, R. M. (2002). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century.
Gajek, A., Fabiano, B., Laurent, A., & Jensen, N. (2022). Process safety education of future employee 4.0 in industry 4.0. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 75, 104691.
Geuer, L., Lauer, F., Kuhn, J., Wehn, N., & Ulber, R. (2023). Smaepho-smart photometry in education 4.0. Education Sciences, 13(2), 136.
Goldin, T., Rauch, E., Pacher, C., & Woschank, M. (2022). Reference architecture for an integrated and synergetic use of digital tools in education 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 407-417.
Haderer, B., & Ciolacu, M. (2022). Education 4.0: artificial intelligence assisted task-and time planning system. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 1328-1337.
Halili, S. H. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-learning, 7(1), 63-69.
Huang, A. Y., Lu, O. H., & Yang, S. J. (2023). Effects of artificial intelligence-enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 194, 104684.
Jaliseh, S., Jafari nia, S., Kheirandish, M & Hassanpour, A. (2019). Designing a network resource management model in the governance of networks of the ministry of health treatment and medical education. Public Policy. 3(5),113-139 [in Persian].
Jeong, H. (2019). Cognitive mechanisms of collaborative learning and technology supports. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 30(1), 1-30.
Joshi, K., Kumar, R., Bharany, S., Saini, D. K. J. B., Kumar, R., Ibrahim, A. O., ... & Medani, M. A. (2024). Exploring the connectivity between education 4.0 and classroom 4.0: technologies, student perspectives, and engagement in the digital era. IEEE Access, 12, 24179-24204.
Kamali, Y. (2016). Methodology of content analysis and its application in public policy studies. Public Policy Research. 4(2).
Kizilkaya, B., Zhao, G., Sambo, Y. A., Li, L., & Imran, M. A. (2021). 5G-enabled education 4.0: enabling technologies, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 9, 166962-166969.
Koseda, E., Cohen, I. K., McIntosh, B., & Cooper, J. (2025). Internationalisation and digital transformation in heis: the impact of education 4.0 on teaching, learning and assessment. Policy Futures in Education, 23(1), 1-9.
Kuleto, V., Ilić, M. P., Bucea-manea-Țoniş, R., Ciocodeică, D. F., Mihălcescu, H., & Mindrescu, V. (2022). The attitudes of k-12 schools’ teachers in Serbia towards the potential of artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 14(14), 8636.
Kumar, S., & Kaur, M. (2023). Readiness for education 4.0: pandemic as the wakeup call for teacher education institutions. J Adv Educ Philos, 7(1), 10-13.
Laura icela, G. P., María soledad, R. M., & Juan antonio, E. G. (2023). Education 4.0 maturity models for society 5.0: systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2256095.
Martin, J., Bohuslava, J., & Igor, H. (2018). Augmented reality in education 4.0. In 2018 Ieee 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT) (Vol. 1, pp. 231-236).
Miranda, J., & Molina, A. (2020). Designing hybrid learning programs in higher education by applying education 4.0: the innovation challenge bootcamp as case study. In 2020 IEEE Learning with Moocs (pp. 31-36).
Nguyen, A., Gardner, L., & Sheridan, D. (2020). Data analytics in higher education: an integrated view. Journal of Information Systems Education, 31(1), 61-71.
Oliveira, K. K. D. S., & De Souza, R. A. (2022). Digital transformation towards education 4.0. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 283-309.
Oliveira, S. R. M., & Saraiva, M. A. (2023). Leader skills interpreted in the lens of education 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 1296-1304.
Patiño, A., Ramírez, M. S., & Buenestado, M. (2023). Active learning and education 4.0 for complex thinking training: analysis of two case studies in open education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 8.
Peláez, I. C., Georgereyes, C. E., & Glasserman, L. D. (2023). Gender digital divide in education 4.0: a systematic literature review of factors and strategies for inclusion. Future in Educational Research, 1(2), 129-146.
Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Raza, H., Imran, A., & Ismail, F. (2021). Digital technologies in education 4.0. Does it enhance the effectiveness of learning?.
Ramírez, M. S. Ramírez, M, Loaiza, M, Zúñiga, A., & Portuguez, M.(2021). Characterization of the teaching profile within the framework of education 4.0. Future Internet, 13 (4), 91.
Ramírez, M. S., Castillo, I. M., Sanabria, J., & Miranda, J. (2022a). Complex thinking in the framework of education 4.0 and open innovation—a systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 4.
Ramírez, M. S., Mcgreal, R., & Agbu, J. F. O. (2022b). Horizontes digitales complejos en futuro de la educación 4.0: luces desde las recomendaciones de unesco. Ried. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(2), 09-21.
Rani, S., Mishra, R. K., Usman, M., Kataria, A., Kumar, P., Bhambri, P., & Mishra, A. K. (2021). Amalgamation of advanced technologies for sustainable development of smart city environment: a review. IEEE Access, 9, 150060-150087.
Razzaq, A., & Riaz, M. (2023). Some modified picture fuzzy average aggregation operators with priority roles of stakeholders in implementation of education 4.0. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 44(6), 10159-10181.
Rienties, B., Ferguson, R., Gonda, D., Hajdin, G., Herodotou, C., Iniesto, F., & Isidori, M. V. (2023). Education 4.0 in higher education and computer science: a systematic review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(5), 1339-1357.
Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Garay-Rondero, C. L., & Arana-Solares, I. A. (2023). Digitally enabled experiential learning spaces for engineering education 4.0. Education Sciences, 13(1), 63.
Samiha, Y. T., Handayani, T., Razaq, A., Fithriyah, M., Fitri, A., & Anshari, M. (2022). Implementation of education 4.0 as sustainable decisions for a sustainable development. In 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (pp. 846-850).
Srivani, V., Hariharasudan, A., Nawaz, N., & Ratajczak, S. (2022). Impact of education 4.0 among engineering students for learning English language. Plos One, 17(2), e0261717.
Stroe, A. C. (2022). Digitalization of romanian education system: is Romania ready to embrace education 4.0?. Informatica Economica, 26(3), 16-25.
Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning—predictions and possibilities. Education Sciences, 8(1), 35.
Vahidi, H., and Shahrestani, M. (2023). Education 4.0  obstacles and challenges. The First International Conference on Innovation, Growth and Development in Management, Accounting and Humanities ( In Persian).
Van leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71-89.
Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2023). Bridging digital divides: a literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 955-969.
Vikhman, V. V. (2022). Technological trends of industry 4.0 in education: opportunity navigator. Professional Education in the Modern World, 12(1), 29-36.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225.

  • تاریخ دریافت 05 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 19 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 19 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 31 شهریور 1404