تحلیل محتوای سرفصل رشته‏ های مهندسی مکانیک و صنایع، براساس رویکرد حل‏ مسئلۀ ابداعی

اسلامی, سیده زهرا; آیتی, محسن; رستمی نژاد, محمد علی; سلیمی نمین, سارا

doi:10.22047/ijee.2025.494453.2151

تحلیل محتوای سرفصل رشته‏ های مهندسی مکانیک و صنایع، براساس رویکرد حل‏ مسئلۀ ابداعی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

سیده زهرا اسلامی ¹

محسن آیتی ¹

محمد علی رستمی نژاد ¹

سارا سلیمی نمین ²

¹ دانشگاه بیرجند

² دانشگاه صنعتی امیر کبیر

https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2025.494453.2151

چکیده

به‏ منظور ارتقای کیفیت آموزش و تربیت مهندسان توانمند، می‏بایست برنامه‏ های درسی دانشگاه ‏ها شامل روش‏ها و راه ‏حل ‏های خلاقانۀ رویارویی با مسائل پیچیده و ناشناخته باشد. این امر ازطریقِ بهره ‏گیری از رویکردهای نوآورانه و نظام ‏مند، همچون رویکرد حل مسئلۀ ابداعی، امکان‏ پذیر است. هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل محتوای سرفصل رشته‏ های مهندسی مکانیک و صنایع براساس اصول حل مسئلۀ ابداعی بوده است. برای رسیدن به هدف پژوهش، از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفیِ قیاسی استفاده کردیم. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش سرفصل‏ های مصوب وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری در مقطع کارشناسی رشتۀ مهندسی مکانیک و صنایع بود. همچنین از روش نمونه‏ گیری هدفمند (ملاک‏ محور) بهره بردیم که حجم نمونه در سرفصل دروس مهندسی مکانیک شامل 31 واحد درسی، معادل 11 عنوان درسی، و در دروس مهندسی صنایع درمجموع 63 واحد درسی، معادل 21 عنوان درسی، بود. دروس برگزیده از دروس کلیدی و مهم برنامۀ درسی هستند که تأثیر بیشتری بر توانمندسازی دانشجویان در حل مسائل دارند. ابزار گردآوری داده‏ ها فهرست وارسی تحلیل محتوا بود که مؤلفه‏ ها و نشانگرهای آن را براساس اصول تریز تعیین کردیم. واحد تحلیل پژوهش اهداف سرفصل واحدهای درسی در برنامۀ درسی بود. واحد ثبت مضمون اهداف بود. نتایج پژوهش نشان می ‏دهد دروس ارتعاشات مکانیکی (رفع تضادگرایی)، مدیریت و کنترل پروژه (منبع ‏گرایی و ایدئال‏ گرایی)، مقاومت مصالح و دینامیک ماشین (کارکردگرایی) در مهندسی مکانیک و نیز دروس مدیریت کنترل پروژه، برنامه ‏ریزی و کنترل موجودی، مدیریت و برنامه‏ ریزی استراتژیک و طراحی ایجاد صنایع (منبع ‏گرایی) در مهندسی صنایع با اصول تریز هم‏سویی دارند. در انتهای پژوهش، پیشنهادهایی برای توجه به حل مسئلۀ ابداعی در برنامه‏ های‏ درسی مطرح کرده ‏ایم.

کلیدواژه‌ها

حل مسئلۀ ابداعی

سرفصل

تحلیل محتوا

برنامۀ درسی

آموزش مهندسی

20.1001.1.16072316.1404.27.107.5.9

موضوعات

نوآوری، خلاقیت و کارآفرینی در آموزش مهندسی

عنوان مقاله English

CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE SYLLABUS OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES BASED ON THE INVENTIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING APPROACH

نویسندگان English

seyede zahra eslami ¹

mohsen ayati ¹

mohammad ali rostaminejad ¹

Sarah Salimi Namin ²

¹ university birjand

² Amirkabir University

چکیده English

To enhance the quality of education and develop competent engineers, university curricula must include creative methods and solutions for addressing complex and unknown problems. This can be achieved through the adoption of innovative and systematic approaches, such as the inventive problem-solving methodology. For this aim, the present study was conducted to analyze the content of the syllabi for mechanical and industrial engineering programs based on the principles of inventive problem-solving. To achieve the research objectives, a qualitative content analysis method of the deductive type was employed. The statistical population consisted of approved syllabi by the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology for the undergraduate programs in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. In this study, purposive sampling (criterion-based) was utilized. The sample size in the Mechanical Engineering course syllabus includes 31 credits, equivalent to 11 course titles. In the industrial engineering courses, the total comprises 63 credits, equivalent to 21 course titles. The selected courses are among the key and important courses of the curriculum, having a greater impact on empowering students to solve problems. The data collection tool was a content analysis checklist, with components and indicators determined based on TRIZ principles. The unit of analysis was the objectives stated in the course syllabi. The recording unit was the content of the objectives. Research results indicate that the courses mechanical vibrations (contradiction), project management and control (resource and ideality), strength of materials, and machine dynamics (functionality) in mechanical engineering, and the courses project management and control, inventory planning and control, strategic management and planning, and designing the creation of industries (resource) in industrial engineering, align with TRIZ principles. At the end of the research, suggestions have been made to consider inventive problem solving in curricula.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Inventive problem solving

syllabus

content analysis

curriculum

engineering education

Altshuller, G.S. (1998). The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation, and technical creativity: Technical Innovation Center.
Barry, K., Domb, E., & Slocum, M. S. (2010). TRIZ-what is TRIZ. The TRIZ Journal, 603-632.
Belski, I. (2011). TRIZ course enhances thinking and problem solving skills of engineering students. Procedia Engineering, 9, 450-460.
Brown, S., & Black, K. (2019). TRIZ and education: A literature review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 233(5), 1407-1422.
Cascini, G; Jantschgi, J; Khomenko, N; Murashkovska, I; Sokol, A & Tomasi, F .(2008). TETRIS: Teaching TRIZ at school-meeting the educational requirements of heterogeneous curricula. Proceedings of the 8th ETRIA TRIZ Future Conference, Floranc.
Eversheim, W. (2009). Innovation management for technical products: Systematic and integrated product development and production planning. Springer-Verlag.
Gräbe, H. G. (2022). Systems, resources, and systemic development in TRIZ. International TRIZ Future Conference , Warsaw.
Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice.Technovation, 33(2-3), 30-37.
Jabal Ameri, M., Mozaffar, F., Karimi, M., & Ghasemi, V. (2018). Application of TRIZ functionalism in the architectural design process. Journal of Fine Arts, Architecture and Urban Planning, 33(3), 83-94 [in Persian].
Jani, H. M. (2013). Teaching TRIZ problem-solving methodology in higher education: a review. International Journal, 2(9), 98-103.
Jiang, J.-g., Zhang, Y.-d., Zhang, J.-y., & Du, H.-y. (2013). Training pattern of undergraduate’s innovative ability based on TRIZ theory. Proceedings of the 2013 8th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 1461-1466.
Karimi, M. (2005). Undoubted improvement: applied engineering education value, Rasa, Tehran [in Persian].
Khomenko, N., & Ashtiani, M. (2007). Classical TRIZ and OTSM as a scientific theoretical background for non-typical problem solving instruments. ETRIA TRIZ Future Conference, Frankfurt .
Khomenko, N., & De Guio, R. (2007). OTSM network of problems for representing and analyzing problem situations with computer support, Trends in computer aided innovation, Springer, Boston.
Litvin S., Petrov V., Rubin M. (2007). TRIZ body of knowledge. TRIZ Developers Summit, Russia.
Mahmoudian Azar Sharbiyani, A., & Babaian Pour, M. (2020). Application of TRIZ theory in resistance economy (case study component: production boom). Science and Technology of Construction, 1(4), 11-26 [in Persian].
Mann, M. (2000b). The four pillars of TRIZ. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241256240 .
Mann, M. (2002a). Hands-on systematic innovation for business & management. London, UK: Lazarus Press.
Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology. (2009). Undergraduate curriculum for the mechanical engineering program.
Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (2022). Undergraduate curriculum for Industrial Engineering: Revised Edition.
Mueller, S. (2005). The TRIZ resource analysis tool for solving management tasks: previous classifications and their modification. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 43-58.
Nakagawa, T. (2011). Education and training of creative problem solving thinking with TRIZ/USIT. Procedia Engineering, 9, 582-595.
Navas, H. V., Tenera, A. M., & Machado, V. A. C. (2015). Integrating TRIZ in project management processes: An ARIZ contribution. Procedia Engineering, 131, 224-231.
Peng, Z., Shen, H., & Tao, Y. (2020). Research on innovative design method based on TRIZ taking the elderly-oriented transformation of outdoor seats as an example. International Conference on Environment and Water Resources Engineering, Les Ulysses, France.
Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving (1st ed.). CRC Press.
Sheu, D. D., & Yen, M. Z. (2020). Systematic analysis and usage of harmful resources. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 145, 106459.
Smith, J., & Smith, J. (2018). Enhancing problem solving and creativity through the application of the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(5), 708-729.
Souchkov, V. (1997). Accelerate innovation with TRIZ. Retrieved from http://www.xtriz.com/publications/AccelerateInnovationWithTRIZ.pdf. (Accessed November 30, 2011).
Souchkov, V. (2007). Breakthrough thinking with TRIZ for business and management: An overview. http://www.xtriz.com/TRIZforBusinessAndManagement.pdf.
Souchkov, V. (2014). Glossary of TRIZ and TRIZ-related terms. 2015-06-06]. http://matriz. org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/10/TRIZ glossaryversion1-2. pdf.
Tandpour, S., & Kafili, N. (2019). Application of TRIZ knowledge to explain the position of creative design in contemporary Iranian functional ceramics. Journal of Fine Arts - Visual Arts, 25(13), 99-110 [in Persian].