کارِ گروهیِ مؤثر بر آموزش مهندسی: تأثیر آن بر خلاقیت، همیاری و یادگیری دانشجویان

بیگ پوریان, بهزاد

doi:10.22047/ijee.2025.508342.2157

کارِ گروهیِ مؤثر بر آموزش مهندسی: تأثیر آن بر خلاقیت، همیاری و یادگیری دانشجویان

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده

بهزاد بیگ پوریان

گروه آموزش مهندسی، دانشکده علوم مهندسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2025.508342.2157

چکیده

مؤسسات اعتبارسنجی آموزش مهندسی معتبر دنیا بر کسب مهارت کار گروهی مؤثر، همیاری و خلاقیت بالا در دانشجویان مهندسی تأکید صریح دارند. بااین‌حال، تاکنون درخصوص کار گروهی مؤثر بر آموزش مهندسی و تأثیر آن بر خلاقیت و همیاری دانشجویان پژوهش نشده است. پژوهش حاضر چارچوبی را برمبنای مدل نظری و تحقیقات پیشین طراحی کرده است که روش کار گروهی مؤثر را در کلاس‌های مهندسی نشان می‌دهد. همچنین، برای ارزیابی تأثیر الگوی کار گروهی مؤثر، سه گروه آزمایشی را در کلاس‌های درس مهندسی مطالعه می‎کند: گروه یکم، در فعالیتی فردی طرحی کلاسی را اجرا کرده است؛ گروه دوم، فعالیت را به‌صورت گروهی، بدون استفاده از توصیه‌های کار گروهی مؤثر، اجرا کرده است و، گروه سوم، با کمک چارچوب پیشنهادی کار گروهی مؤثر را تجربه کرده‌ است. درنهایت، نمرۀ خلاقیت، همیاری کلاسی و یادگیری دانشجویان با کمک روش تحلیل واریانس مقایسه و مشخص شده است که درصورت استفاده از کار گروهی خلاقیت، همیاری و یادگیری دانشجویان افزایش می‌یابد و اگر کار گروهی به‎شکل مؤثر انجام پذیرد خلاقیت و همیاری دانشجویان بیشتر هم می‎شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

کار گروهی

پویایی گروه

خلاقیت

آموزش مهندسی

تشکیل گروه

20.1001.1.16072316.1404.27.107.2.6

موضوعات

روش‌ های نوین یاددهی و یادگیری در آموزش مهندسی

عنوان مقاله English

EFFECTIVE TEAMWORK IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ITS IMPACT ON STUDENT CREATIVITY, INTERACTION, AND LEARNING

نویسنده English

Behzad Beigpourian

Engineering Education Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده English

The world’s most reputable engineering education accreditation institutions have explicitly emphasized the necessity of acquiring effective teamwork skills, interaction skills, and creativity by engineering students. However, no research in Iranian universities examines effective teamwork in engineering education and its impact on student creativity and interaction. This research proposes a framework based on a theoretical model and previous research findings to fill this research gap. This framework proposes a method for using effective teamwork in engineering classes by suggesting appropriate methods for team formation, managing team dynamics, teaching effective teamwork, and conducting peer evaluation. Then, to evaluate the impact of this effective team model, three experimental groups were studied: Group 1, which carried out a class project in an individual activity, Group 2, which carried out the activity as a team without using effective teamwork recommendations, and Group 3, which experienced effective teamwork with the help of the proposed framework. Finally, the scores of creativity, interaction with classmates, and learning of students were compared using the one-way ANOVA method, and it was found that if teamwork is used, students’ creativity, interaction, and learning increase, and if effective teamwork strategies are used, students’ creativity and interaction increase further.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Teamwork

team dynamic

creativity

engineering education

team creation

ABET. (2024). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2023-2024. ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2023-2024.
Alba-flores, R. & Rios, F. (2019). Incorporating peer review techniques to enhance students’ communication skills and team performance in engineering capstone projects., (5(B)), 1969-1982.
Badran, I. (2007). Enhancing creativity and innovation in engineering education., (5), 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701433061.
Baker, D. P., Salas, E., King, H., Battles, J. & Barach, P. (2005). The role of teamwork in the professional education of physicians: Current status and assessment recommendations., (4), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31025-7.
Beigpourian, B. (2020). Purdue University.
Beigpourian, B., EbrahimiNejad, H., Ohland, M. W. & Ferguson, D. M. (2019). The effect of preferred leadership role and preferred team leadership structure on students’ perception of team processes and outcome. , 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028453.
Beigpourian, B., Ohland, M. & Ferguson, D. (2020). Effect of Psychological Safety on the Interaction of Students in Teams. , 34497. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34497.
Beigpourian, B. & Ohland, M. W. (2024). Psychological safety and team member effectiveness of minoritized students in engineering education. , (6), 57-84 https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2023043341.
Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D. & Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. , (4), 472-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20023.
Chang, T.-S., Wang, H.-C., Haynes, A. M., Song, M.-M., Lai, S.-Y. & Hsieh, S.-H. (2022). Enhancing student creativity through an interdisciplinary, project-oriented problem-based learning undergraduate curriculum. , , 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101173.
Cinar, Y., & Bilgin, A. A. (2009). A study on peer assessment of teamwork projects in undergraduate petroleum engineering education. , SPE-123166-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/123166-MS.
Cinar, Y., & Bilgin, A. A. (2011). Peer assessment for undergraduate teamwork projects in petroleum engineering. , (2), 310-322.
Cropley, D. H. (2015). Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. , (2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000008.
Edmondson, A. C., & Harvey, J.-F. (2025). Team learning in the field: An organizing framework and avenues for future research. , (3), 614-632. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964251316877.
ENAEE. (2008). European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education. Engineers Australia. (2013). Stage 1 Competency standard for professional engineer. Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N. & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes., (1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00667.x.
Ford, D. N. & Sterman, J. D. (2003). The Liar’s club: Concealing rework in concurrent development. , (3), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/106329303038028.
Godwin, A., Kirn, A. & Rohde, J. (2017). Awareness without action: Student attitudes after engineering teaming experiences. , (6a), 1878-1891.
Griffin, P. M., Griffin, S. O. & Llewellyn, D. C. (2004). The impact of group size and project duration on capstone design. , (3), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00805.x.
Gunawan, H., Hadis, A. & Qur’ani, B. (2024). Strategy for Increasing the creative performance of civil servants in public services: Effectiveness of education and training through teamwork., (03). https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V04I3Y2024-04.
Guzzo, R. a. & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. (Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), (pp. 315-342). Prentice Hall.
Huerta, M. V., Sajadi, S., Schibelius, L., Ryan, O. J. & Fisher, M. (2024). An exploration of psychological safety and conflict in first-year engineering student teams. , (3), 635-666 https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20608.
Jiang, Z., Hu, X., Wang, Z. & Griffin, M. A. (2024). Enabling workplace thriving: A multilevel model of positive affect, team cohesion, and task interdependence. , (1), 323-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12481.
Khalid, A., Kazim, T., Diaz, K. R. V. & Iqbal, J. (2023). Breaking barriers in higher education: Implementation of cost-effective social constructivism in engineering education., 03064190231218123. https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231218123.
Kimpton, C. & Maynard, N. (2025). Factors shaping teamwork skills development in tertiary engineering education: A systematic literature review., (2), 253-280 https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2357343.
Krishnan, S., Gabb, R. & Vale, C. (2011). Learning cultures of problem-based learning teams. , (2), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2011.11464057.
Layton, R. A., Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W. & Ricco, G. D. (2010). Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria., (1), 1-28.
Leonardi, P. M., Jackson, M. H. & Diwan, A. (2009). The enactment-externalization dialectic: Rationalization and the persistence of counterproductive technology design practices in student engineering., (2), 400-420.
McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction. Rinehart and Winston.
Millis, B. J., & Philip G. Cottell, J. (1998). Oryx Press.
Minz, N. K. & Saluja, A. (2023). Developing skills with team-based learning. B. Scott & M. E. Fox (Eds.), (pp. 25-53). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7583-6.ch002.
O’Neill, T. A., Aldana, A. J., Espinoza, J. A., Sperry, M. P., Brykman, K. M. & Donia, M. B. L. (2024). Conflict management styles assessment and feedback for student self-awareness and team development. , (8), 1091-1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2350682.
Parker, R., Sangelkar, S., Swenson, M. & Ford, J. D. (2019). Launching for success: A review of team formation for capstone design. , (6(B)), 1926-1936.
Picard, C., Hardebolle, C., Tormey, R. & Schiffmann, J. (2022). Which professional skills do students learn in engineering team-based projects?, (2), 314-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1920890.
Reddy, Y. M. & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. , (4), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859.
Ryan, O., Fisher, M., Schibelius, L., Huerta, M. & Sajadi, S. (2023). Using a scenario-based learning approach with instructional technology to teach conflict management to engineering students. , 44561. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--44561.
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K. & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. , (4), 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022625.
Steiner, M., & Kanai, J. (2016). Creating effective multidisciplinary capstone project teams. , (2(A)), 625-639.
Strenger, L., Beigpourian, B., Ohland, M. & Ferguson, D. (2020). The effect of different dimensions of conflict on measures of team-member effectiveness. , 35306 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--35306.
Takai, S. & Esterman, M. (2019). A review of team effectiveness models and possible instruments for measuring design-team inputs, processes, and outputs. , (6(A)), 1684-1697.
Tang, P. C. (1938). The power function of the analysis of variance tests, with tables and illustrations of their use. 126-149.
Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L. & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In K. Kelley (Ed.), (pp. 117-153). North-Holland.
Tucker, R., Abbasi, N., Thorpe, G., Ostwald, M., Williams, A. & Wallis, L. (2014). Office for Learning and Teaching, Department of Education.
Verhagen, R. S., Marcu, A., Neerincx, M. A. & Tielman, M. L. (2024). The influence of interdependence on trust calibration in human-machine teams. F. Lorig, J. Tucker, A. Dahlgren Lindström, F. Dignum, P. Murukannaiah, A. Theodorou, & P. Yolum (Eds.),. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240203.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Harvard University Press.
Yang, Y., Li, Z., Liang, L. & Zhang, X. (2021). Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: Thriving at work and psychological safety., (4), 1911-1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0095-1.