واکاوی وضعیت جاری برنامه‏های درسی رشتۀ مهندسی کامپیوتر در مقطع کارشناسی: رویکرد تحلیل زمینه‏ای

غلام پور, میثم; محمودی, محمد; کیذوری, امیرحسین

doi:10.22047/ijee.2025.513767.2163

واکاوی وضعیت جاری برنامه‏های درسی رشتۀ مهندسی کامپیوتر در مقطع کارشناسی: رویکرد تحلیل زمینه‏ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

میثم غلام پور ¹

محمد محمودی ²

امیرحسین کیذوری ³

¹ استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری، سبزوار، ایران(نویسنده مسئول)

² دکتری مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

³ دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری، سبزوار، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2025.513767.2163

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر واکاوی وضع کنونی برنامه ‏های درسی رشتۀ مهندسی کامپیوتر، با رویکرد کیفی و روش داده ‏بنیاد، است. حوزۀ پژوهش شامل همۀ اعضای هیئت ‏علمی و دانشجویان رشتۀ مهندسی کامپیوتر بود که ازطریقِ نمونه‏گیری هدفمند از نوع ملاک‏محور انتخاب شدند. داده‏ها ازطریقِ مصاحبۀ نیمه ‏ساختاریافته با 11 دانشجو و 16 عضو هیئت‏ علمی جمع‏ آوری شد. به‏ منظور تحلیل داده‏ها، از روش کدگذاری باز، محوری و گزینشی استفاده کردیم. برای تأمین روایی و پایایی، از معیارهای گوبا و لینکن استفاده کردیم. یافته‏ های پژوهش نشان‏دهندۀ 22 مفهوم محوری و 8 مقولۀ منتخب است که در قالب الگویی، شامل برنامۀ درسی ناسازگار با تحولات به‏ عنوان شرایط محوری، شرایط علّی (تمرکزگرایی در طراحی، تدوین نامناسب و اجرای معیوب برنامه‏ های درسی)، عوامل زمینه‏ ای (زمینۀ ابعاد رفتاری، زمینه‏ های سیاسی و زمینه‏ های محیطی)، راهبردهای پیشنهادی (تأسیس دانشکدگان موضوعی، ترویج مطالعات تطبیقی، شبکه‏ سازی، واگذاری اختیار به دفترهای برنامه ‏ریزی آموزشی دانشگاه و طراحی باز برنامۀ درسی رشتۀ مهندسی کامپیوتر)، عوامل مداخله‏ ای (نیازسنجی، مؤلفه ‏های ساختاری، استانداردهای آموزشی‏ ‏پژوهشی و پایگاه علمی رشتۀ مهندسی کامپیوتر) و پیامد (کاهش اثربخشی و کارایی برنامه ‏درسی) سازمان یافت. با توجه به یافته ‏ها، نتیجه می ‏گیریم که بهبود برنامه ‏های درسی رشتۀ مهندسی کامپیوتر نیازمند طراحی باز و مشارکتیِ برنامه های درسی و ایجاد دانشکدگان مهندسی کامپیوتر در دانشگاه ‏هاست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مهندسی کامپیوتر

برنامۀ درسی

دانشجویان

کارشناسی

20.1001.1.16072316.1404.27.106.4.6

موضوعات

ارزشیابی برنامه ها و دروس مهندسی

عنوان مقاله English

ANALYZING THE CURRENT STATUS OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING CURRICULUMS AT THE UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS APPROACH

نویسندگان English

Meysam Gholampour ¹

Mohammad Mahmoodi ²

Amir hossein kayzouri ³

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

² PhD in Curriculum Studies, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

³ Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

چکیده English

This study aims to investigate the current state of computer engineering curricula. This study was conducted using a qualitative approach and a data-driven method. The research area included all faculty members and computer engineering students selected through a purposive sampling of the criterion-based type. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eleven students and sixteen faculty members. Open, axial, and selective coding methods were used to analyze the data. Lincoln and Cuba criteria were used to ensure validity and reliability. The research findings indicate twenty-two central concepts and eight selected categories that are organized in a paradigmatic model including curriculum incompatible with developments as central conditions, causal conditions (centralism in design, inappropriate formulation, and defective implementation of curricula), contextual factors (behavioral dimensions, political contexts, and environmental contexts), suggested strategies (establishing subject-specific faculties, promoting comparative studies, networking, delegating authority to university educational planning offices and open design of the computer engineering curriculum), intervention factors (needs assessment, structural components, educational-research standards and scientific base of the computer engineering discipline) and consequence (reduction in curriculum effectiveness and efficiency). According to the findings, it can be concluded that to improve computer engineering curricula, attention should be paid to open and participatory curriculum design and the establishment of computer engineering faculties in universities.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Computer engineering

curriculum

students

undergrade

Ahmadi, Gh. A. (2006). Investigating the degree of coherence and coordination between the three intended, implemented and acquired curricula in the new elementary science education program. Education and Training, 22(2), 51-92. [in Persian].
Akbari Pardijani, Z., & Salehi, K. (2024). Systematic review of critical thinking achievements in engineering education. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 26(101), 47-84 [in Persian].
Al-Junaid, H., Almeer, M., Khlaifat, J., & Bushager, A. (2019). Developing a computer engineering undergraduate curriculum: the challenges and solutions. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 45-53.
Amrollah, A., Shirali, E., Mohammadi, R., & Khodayi, E. (2022). Design and evaluation of the validation model for technical and engineering curricula in the undergraduate level (case: faculty of electrical and computer engineering, university of tehran). Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 12(40), 1-25 [in Persian].
Amrollah, O., Khodai, E., Hakimzadeh, R., & Nili Ahmadabadi, M. (2017). Presentation and implementation of outcome-based validation model for technical and engineering curricula (case study: “advanced programming” course from computer engineering). Iranian Engineering Education, 19(76), 29-59 [in Persian].
Bahri Ghamichi, K., Samari, M., & Soltan Ahmadi, J. A. (2018). Investigating the challenges of the electrical engineering curriculum for the purpose of revision and modernization. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 20(79), 1-25 [in Persian].
Danaei fard, H., Alvani, Mehdi & Azar, A. (2017). Qualitative Research Methodology in Management: A Comprehensive Approach. Tehran: Saffar. [in Persian].
Durant, E., Impagliazzo, J., Conry, S., Reese R., Lam, H., Nelson, V., Hughes, J., Liu, W., Junlin, L., Herger, L., & McGettrick, A., CE. (2016). Updated computer engineering curriculum guidelines. Proc. Frontiers in Educ.Conf, 2, 18-21.
Earnstein A, Hawkins F P. (2013). Basics of curriculum principles and issues. Translation, Ghodsi-e-Ahqar. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch. [in Persian].
Erdil, E., & Bilsel, A. (2005). Curriculum design to revitalise electrical engineering education at Eastern mediterraneanUniversity. Inter. J. of Electrical Engng. Educ, 42, 3, 234-246 (2005).
Farastkhah, M. (2017). Qualitative research method in social sciences (with Emphasis on Grounded Theory) Grand Theory (GTM). Tehran: Agah. [in Persian].
Fathi Vajargah, K. (2023). Basic principles and concepts of curriculum planning. Tehran: Alam Ostadan. [in Persian].
Ghazanfarian, J. (2024). Improving the efficiency of the mechanical engineering curriculum by combining global, local and future-oriented perspectives. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 26(102), 1-19 [in Persian].
Ghorbani, M. A., Zolfaghari Zafarani, R. & Imani, M. (2023). Designing a conceptual model of innovative educational methods in higher education (case study of Islamic azad university of tehran). Islamic Lifestyle with a Health Focus, 7(2), 218-226 [in Persian].
Guzman, J. H. E., Zuluaga-Ortiz, R. A., Donado, L. E. G., Delahoz-Dominguez, E. J., Marquez-Castillo, A., & Suarez-Sánchez, M. (2022). Cluster analysis in higher education Institutions’ knowledge identification and production processes. Procedia Computer Science, 203, 570-574. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.081.
Hadgraft, R. (2017). New curricula for engineering education: experiences, engagement, e-resources. Global J. of Engng Educ, 19, 2, 112-117 .
Hosseini, M., & Nasr, A. (2012). Accreditation of higher education in the third millennium with a focus on curriculum. Letter of Higher Education, 5(17), 13-48 [in Persian].
IEEE Computer Society (2016). A report in the computing curricula series joint task force on computer engineering curricula association for computing machinery. Association for Computing Machinery; DOI: 10.1145/3025098.
Jamali, M., Arasteh, H., Abbasian, H., & Abdollahi, B. (2023). Identifying the effective components on the teaching-learning process for training engineering students with high employability. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(98), 7-27 [in Persian].
Khaleel, M., Jebrel, A., & Shwehdy, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in computer science. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Sustainability, 2(2), 1-21.
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2023). Curriculum of perspectives, approaches and perspectives. Roshd Publications: Tehran [in Persian].
Mohammadi, M. (2022). A study of geography students’ experiences with the geography curriculum at farhangian university. Research in Social Studies Education, 4(4), 95-110 [in Persian].
Mohammadi, M., Shirin Hesai, R. & Salimi, Gh. (2023). Attitudes of engineering students at shiraz university towards the suitability of postgraduate curricula with a sustainable development approach. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(100), 27-47 [in Persian].
Moradi Doliskani, M., Mirshah Jafari, E., & Neistani, M. R. (2019). Analysis of the type and degree of influence of curriculum role-players in the curriculum planning committee of iranian universities: a pathological look at the current situation. Theory and Practice in Curriculum, 8 (16), 119-154 [in Persian].
Nasrollahinia, F., & Alamhuda, J. (2020). Review and presentation of the proposed curriculum for the field of educational sciences in the master’s degree program (case study: higher education management and planning. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 11(21), 138-97 [in Persian].
Németh, B. (2019). Learning cities sisyphus. Journal of Education, 7(2), 9-23. DOI: https://Doi.org/10.25749/sis.17702.
Sattari, Sh., Madani, A. & Abbasian Arani, A. A. (2023). A qualitative study of the prerequisites for implementing the curriculum design approach in engineering disciplines. Iranian Journal of Higher Education Policy Engineering Education, 25(97), 97-123 [in Persian.
Strauss, A,. & Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications .
Ubachs, G. (2009). USBM: university strategies and business models for lifelong learning in higher education. Audiovisual & Culture Executive Agency.
Varanasi, M. (2003). Computing curricula - computer engineering. IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education (MSE’03).
Winberg, S. (2014). Responsiveness and responsibility: determining what matters in a computer engineering curriculum. South African J. of Higher Educ, 28, 3, 983-1002.
Xiaozhou, X. (2001). The role of the university in lifelong learning: perspectives from the people’s republic of china, Higher Education Policy, 14 (4), 313-324. DOI:10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00027-7.
Xu, X., & Mei, W. (2018). Policies of lifelong learning. In educational policies and legislation in China (pp.191-217). Springer, Singapore.
Yang, J., Jimenez, C., Wettig, A., Lieret, W., Yao, Sh., Narasimhan, K., & Press, O. (2024). Swe-agent: agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024).
Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2017). Fundamentals and principles of curriculum planning. Yadvareh Kitab Publications: Tehran [in Persian].
Zamanifar, M., Mohammadi, R., & Sadeghimandi, F. (2016). Internal evaluation and improvement of curriculum quality in engineering education departments. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 18(72), 45-67 [in Persian].