Ahmadi, M. & Poornamdarian, T. (2017). “An introduction to multiple meanings of rhetoric”. Journal of language and Translation Studies. 50(1). 27-52. [in Persian].
Alexander, C. (2004), The nature of order: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe, book 4: The Luminous Ground. Routledge
Ballard, G. & Lauri K. (2013). Rhetoric and design. International Conference on Engineering design. ICED13/ sungkyunkwan university. Seoul, Korea.
Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1(1) 1-14. 
Ashouri, D. (1996). Persian dictionary for human sciences. Tehran. Markaz. [in Persian]
Brinton, A. (1981). Situation in the theory of rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric.14 (4), 234-248. 
Brooks, L. W., & Dansereau, D. F. (1987). Transfer of information: An instructional perspective. In S. M. Cormier & J. D. Hagman (Eds.), Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Applications (pp. 121-150). Academic Press.
Buchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. design issues, Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 4-22. 
Buchanan, R. (1995). Rhetoric, humanism and design. discovering design: Explorations in Design Studies  23, 23-66
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design and the new rhetoric: Productive arts in the - philosophy of culture. Philosophy & Rhetoric, Vol. 34, No. 3.  p. 183-206. 
Consigny, Scott. (1974). Rhetoric and Its situations. in philosophy & Rhetoric, Vol. 7, No. 3, Pp. 175- 186. 
Craig, R. T. (2006). Communication as a Practice. In Communication as… : perspectives on theory / Editors gregory J. Shepherd, Jeffrey St. John, and Ted Striphas. by Sage Publications,
Craig, R. T. (2008). Communication in the conversation of disciplines. Russian Journal of Communication, 1(1), 7-23. doi: 10.1080/19409419.2008.10756693
Craig, Robert T. (2009). “Dewey and gadamer on practical reflection: toward a methodology for the practical disciplines” in American Pragmatism and Communication Research. David K.Perry, ed. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Cunningham. A. (1980). Educating around architecture. Studies in Higher Education. 5(2). 131-142.
Dittmar. G. (1984).  Architectural education and the 21st century: Business as Unusal Reflections. 2(1). 4-13
Dixon, P. (1971). Rhetoric. Translated by Afshar, H. Markaz pub.  [in Persian].
Dorst, K. (2006). “Design problems and design paradoxes”, Design Issues, 22, pp. 4-17.
Engbers, S.K. (2018). “Rhetorical theory in design education practice.” Dialectic, 2.1: pgs. 81-95. doi: 10.3998/dialectic.14932326.0002.105
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2004). Truth and method. revised edition. New York: Continuum.
Gelernter. M. (1988). Reconcilling lectures and studios. JAE.41(2). 46-52.
Gero, J. S. & Kannengiess, Udo. (2004). The situated function-behaviour-structure framework Design Studies 25(4): 373-391. 
Gorrell, D. (1997). “The Rhetorical situation again: Linked components in a venn diagram.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 395-412.
Haskell. R. E. (2004), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology.
Hein, C. & Dooren E.V. (2020). Teaching history for design at TU Delft: exploring types of student learning and perceived relevance of history for the architecture profession. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 30(4). Pp. 849-865. DOI:10.1007/s10798-019-09533-5
Last, S. (2019). Technical writing essentials. Introduction to professional communications in the technical Fields. University of Victoria.
Leatherbarrow, D. (2001). “Architecture is its own discipline”. The discipline of architecture, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ledewitz. S. (1985). Models of design in studio Teaching. JAE.38(2). 2-8. 
Marmot.A. & Symens. M. (1983). The architectural case problem. Bartlett School of Architecture & Planning. University college London. 
Marmot.A. & Symens. M. (1985). The social context of design. A case problem Approach. JAE.38(4). 27-31
McKeon, R. (2005). The use of rhetoric in a technological age: Architectonic productive arts. Zahava K.McKeon and William G Swenson(ed.). Selected writings of Richard McKeon.  Volume 2: Culture, Education, and the Arts. Pp.197-205. The University of Chicago Press. 
Miller,  ALISTAIR. (2007). Rhetoric, paideia and the old idea of a liberal education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 41, No. 2.
Nadimi, H. (1998).  “An Introduction to integration in architecture education”. Honarname 1. 76-89. [in Persian].
Nadimi. H. (1997) Aiin javanmardan va tarighate memaran- A look at the photo letters of architects and builders . in Soffeh. 21 [in Persian].
Olmsted, W. (2006). Rhetoric, An historical introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
Perelman, c. (1979). The new rhetoric: A theory of practical reasoning. In: The new rhetoric and the humanities. Synthese Library (Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science), vol 140. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi-org.ezp3.semantak.com/10.1007/978-94-009-9482-9_1
Rendell, J.(2013). Working between and across: Some psychic dimensions of architecture’s inter- and transdisciplinarity. Architecture and Culture, (2), 128-141. DOI:10.2752/175145213X13756908698685
Robinson, J.W. & Andrzej P, (2001). The Discipline of Architecture, Minneapolis, MN: University Minnesota Press. 
Rutten, K. & Ronald S. (2012). Revisiting the rhetorical curriculum, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44:6, pp. 727-743, DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2012.730280
Schon.D.A. (1982). Reflection in Action. Royal Institute of British Architects Trans. 2. 65-75.
Schon, D.A. “Problems, Frames and Perspectives on Designing”, Design Studies, 5 (1984), pp. 132-136.
Simon. H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence. Volume 4, Issues 3-4. Pp. 181-201 
Snodgrass, A. & Coyne, R. 2006. Interpretation in architecture: Design as a way of thinking.
Teymur. N. (1983). Architectural education in a divided world. Architectural education 2: 84-93.
Toulmin. S. (1988). The Recovery of Practical Philosophy. The American Scholar. 57(3) , 337-352.
Troiani, I., Suzanne E. & Diana P. (2014).  Architecture and Culture: Architecture’s Disciplinarity. Architecture and culture. 2, 6-19. 
Turnbull, N. (2017) . Political rhetoric and its relationship to context: a new theory of the rhetorical situation, the rhetorical and the political. Critical Discourse Studies 14 (2). Pp.115-131. 
Wilson. T. (1553). The arte of rhetorique (1553). Tudor and Stuart Library. Edited by G.H. Mair. At the Clarendon press.Mc mix. 
Zeinali.F. & Farahza.N.(2020). Integrated design taught with technical knowledge in architectural education Comparison architectural curriculum in undergraduate in the top world universities & Iran. Honar ha ye ziba. Memari va shahrsazi.25(2). Pp. 95-106.