نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو دکتری/ دانشگاه شیراز

2 دانشگاه شیراز، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، بخش مدیریت

3 استاد، گروه برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه شیراز.

4 استاد دانشکده مهندسی برق و کامپیوتر دانشگاه شیراز

5 دانشیار، گروه برنامه ریزی درسی دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

صنعت نسل چهارم یکی از چالش‏برانگیزترین موضوعات برای طراحی مهندسی و همچنین برای آموزش عالی است. در این راستا یکی از موضوعات جذاب محافل دانشگاهی و صنعتی ایجاد توانمندی‏ها، الزامات و شایستگی‏ها در دانشجویان برای انطباق با این صنعت است. هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی شایستگی‏هایی دانشجویان مهندسی و الزامات آموزش عالی بر اساس رویکرد کیفی با روش فراترکیب است. یافته‏های پژوهش نشان داد که شایستگی‏ها و الزامات در ابعاد: 1. شایستگی‏های دانشجویان مهندسی (توانمندی‏های فردی، دانش و مهارت تخصصی، توانمندی‏های اجتماعی، مهارت‏های فناورانه) 2. الزامات دانشگاهی (الزامات آموزشی 0/4، بسترهای آموزشی، الزامات برنامه درسی، بهسازی اساتید) 3. الزامات غیردانشگاهی (مهارت‏های راهبردی صنعت 0/4، الزامات بازار کار) 4. توسعه منابع انسانی شناسایی گردید. یافته‏های مطالعه کنونی می‏تواند برای برنامه‏ریزی توسعه رویکردهای جدید در برنامه‏های درسی آموزش مهندسی مفید باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Competencies of engineering students and equirements of universities and higher education centers to adapt to Industry 4.0: A study based on the meta-synthesis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mosayeb Bameri 1
  • ghasem salimi 2
  • Rahmatullah Marzooqi 3
  • Seyyed Ali Safavi 4
  • Mehdi Mohammadi 5

1 Ph.D. student/Shiraz University

2 Shiraz university

3 Professor, Curriculum Planning Department, Shiraz University.

4 Professor, Shiraz University

5 Associate Professor, Curriculum Planning Department, Shiraz University

چکیده [English]

Industry 4.0 is one of the most challenging topics for engineering design as well as higher education. One of the fascinating topics of academic and industrial circles has been the creation of capabilities, requirements, and competencies in students to adapt to industry 4.0. This study aims to identify the capabilities, requirements, and competencies of higher education and graduate students based on a qualitative approach and the meta-synthesis study. Findings indicate that competencies and requirements in the dimensions of: 1. Competencies of engineering students (individual abilities, specialized knowledge, and skills, social abilities, technological skills), 2. University requirements (educational requirements 4.0, educational contexts, curriculum requirements, faculty improvement), 3. Non-university requirements (industry strategic skills 4.0, labor market requirements), 4. Human resource development were identified. The current study›s findings would be useful for planning the development of new approaches in engineering education curricula.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Competencies
  • engineering students
  • higher education
  • education 4.0
  • meta-synthesis
  • industry 4.0
Abedi Jafari, A & Amiri, M. (2019). Meta-synthesis as a method for synthesizing qualitative researches, Metodology of Sicial Science and Humanities, 25(99), 73-87. [In Persian].
Barroso J. Gollop C. Sandelowski M. Meynell J. Pearce P. & Collins L. (2003). The challenge of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(2), 153–178.
Blayone , T. J., & VanOostveen, R. (2021). Prepared for work in Industry 4.0? Modelling the target activity system and five dimensions of worker readiness. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 34(1), 1-19.‏
Brudermann, T., Aschemann, R., Füllsack, M., & Posch, A. (2019). Education for sustainable development 4.0: Lessons learned from the University of Graz, Austria. Sustainability, 11(8), 2347.‏
Dos Santos, M. T., Vianna Jr, A. S., & Le Roux, G. A. (2018). Programming skills in the industry 4.0: are chemical engineering students able to face new problems? Education for Chemical Engineers, 22, 69-76.‏Goulart, V. G., Liboni, L. B., & Cezarino, L. O. (2022). Balancing skills in the digital transformation era: The future of jobs and the role of higher education. Industry and Higher Education, 36(2), 118-127.‏
Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Engineering education for smart 4.0 technology: a review. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(3), 789-803.
Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar, C. A., & McGovern, M. (2020). Competencies for industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(4), 1511-1524.‏
Jagannathan, S., Ra, S., & Maclean, R. (2019). Dominant recent trends impacting on jobs and labor markets-An Overview. International Journal of Training Research, 17(sup1), 1-11.‏
Khalid, K., & Ahmad, A. M. (2021). The relationship between employability skills and career adaptability: A case of undergraduate students of the United Arab Emirates. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning.‏
Kipper, L. M., Iepsen, S., Dal Forno, A. J., Frozza, R., Furstenau, L., Agnes, J., & Cossul, D. (2021). Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0. Technology in Society, 64, 101454.‏
Korkmaz, G., & Kalayci, N. (2019). Theoretical foundations of project based curricula in higher education. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(1), 236-274.‏
Lee, M., Yun, J. J., Pyka, A., Won, D., Kodama, F., Schiuma, G., & Zhao, X. (2018). How to respond to the fourth industrial revolution, or the second information technology revolution? Dynamic new combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 21.
Lieu, T. T. B., Duc, N. H., Gleason, N. W., Hai, D. T., & Tam, N. D. (2018). Approaches in developing undergraduate IT engineering curriculum for the fourth industrial revolution in Malaysia and Vietnam. Creative Education, 9(16), 2752-2772
Liljaniemi, A., & Paavilainen, H. (2020). Using digital twin technology in engineering education–course concept to explore benefits and barriers. Open Engineering, 10(1), 377-385.‏
Luna, A., Chong, M., & Jurburg, D. (2022). Teaching integration, trust, communication, and collaboration competencies using challenge-Based learning for business and engineering programs. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 17(1), 89-98.‏
Matthews, A., McLinden, M., & Greenway, C. (2021). Rising to the pedagogical challenges of the Fourth Industrial Age in the university of future: an integrated model of scholarship. Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 1-21.
Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. , Navarro-Tuch, S. A., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278.
Mohammadi, M ;Saberi, M ; Salimi, Gh & Noori, N. (2018). A practical guide to meta-synthesis method for identifying professional competencies of teachers in teaching nature of science, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(50), 73-106. [in Persian].
Mohammadi, M., & Banakar, F. (2011). Assessments of telecommunication students based on employment standards of engineering project management of shiraz electronic industries, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 12(48), 89-116. [in Persian].
Mokhtar, M. A. , & Noordin, N. (2019). An exploratory study of industry 4.0 in Malaysia: a case study of higher education institution in Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 16(2), 978-987.
Mosayebi, A., Ghorbani, S. , & Masoomi, B. (2020). Applying fuzzy delphi and best-worst method for identifying and prioritizing key factors affecting on university-industry collaboration. Decision Science Letters, 9(1), 107-118.[in Persian].
Mudin, D. K. D. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0: role of universities. Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS), 1-1.
Mujtahid, I. M., Berlian, M., Vebrianto, R., Thahir, M., & Irawan, D. (2021). The development of digital age literacy: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 1169-1179.‏
Najafi, F; Monjazebi, F; Nikpeyma, N. (2013). Meta-synthesis of qualitative research in nursing: a literature review, Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 2(4), 320-335.[in Persian].
Nithyanandam, G., Munguia, J., & Marimuthu, M. (2022). “Digital literacy”: Shaping industry 4.0 engineering curriculums via factory pilot-demonstrators. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 5, 100092.‏
Noblit, G. W. Hare, R. D. & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies.
Paterson, B. L., Throne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pattanapairoj, S., Jamrus, T., Nanthapodej, R. & Sethanan, K. (2020). A gap analysis between the expectation of industry 4.0 and the ability of the current industrial engineering graduates in Khon Kaen University. International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education, Bangkok - Thailand. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4807655.
Pinto, E. B., & Fernandes, G. (2021). Collaborative R&D the key cooperation domain for university-industry partnerships sustainability–position paper. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 102-109
Popkova, E. G., & Zmiyak, K. V. (2019). Priorities of training of digital personnel for industry 4.0: Social competencies vs technical competencies. On the Horizon.‏
Ralph, B. J., Woschank, M., Pacher, C., & Murphy, M. (2022). Evidence-based redesign of engineering education lectures: Theoretical framework and preliminary empirical evidence. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(4), 636-663.‏
Ruohomaa, H., Salminen, V., & Natalia, V. (2021). Education services on industry 4.0 in the age of 4th industrial revolution. Acta Technica Napocensis-series: Applied Mathematics, Mechanics, and Engineering, 64(4s).‏
Sackey, S. M., Bester, A., & Adams, D. (2017). Industry 4.0 learning factory didactic design parameters for industrial engineering education in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 28(1), 114-124.‏
Sait, M. A., & Anshari, M. (2021). Industrial revolution 4.0: A new challenge to Brunei Darussalam’s unemployment issue. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), 12(4), 33-44.‏
Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.‏
Sandelowski, M. Barroso, J. & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.‏
Satpathy, S., Dash, K. K., & Mohapatra, M. (2020). A study on the new design thinking for industrial revolution 4.0, requirements and graduate readiness. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(4).‏
Serafin, C. (2019). Information science in technical education process in czech republic. Int. J. Eng. Pedagog., 9(5), 89-102.‏
Sitepu, R. B. , Eliyana, A. , Raza, A. , & Rosalina, M. (2020). The readiness of educational competency in higher education in connecting the era of industrial revolution 4.0. In SHS Web of Conferences, Vol. 76, p. 01045. EDP Sciences. 
Suarez-Fernandez de Miranda, S., Aguayo-González, F., Ávila-Gutiérrez, M. J., & Córdoba-Roldán, A. (2021). Neuro-competence approach for sustainable engineering. Sustainability, 13(8), 4389.‏
Subramaniam, M., Noordin, M. K., & Nor, H. M. (2021). Eight discipline-problem based learning in industrial training program to develop future proof skills among graduate engineers. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 17(12).‏
Tabuenca, B., García-Alcántara, V., Gilarranz-Casado, C., & Barrado-Aguirre, S. (2020). Fostering environmental awareness with smart IoT planters in campuses. Sensors, 20(8), 2227.‏
Terkowsky, C., Frye, S., & May, D. (2019). Online engineering education for manufacturing technology: Is a remote experiment a suitable tool to teach competencies for “Working 4.0”? European Journal of Education, 54(4), 577-590.‏
Tri, N. M., Hoang, P. D., & Dung, N. T. (2021). Impact of the industrial revolution 4.0 on higher education in Vietnam: challenges and opportunities. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1-15.
Tri, N. M., Hoang, P. D., & Dung, N. T. (2021). Impact of the industrial revolution 4.0 on higher education in Vietnam: challenges and opportunities. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1-15.
Tseng, C. T., Lee, C. Y., & Tai, K. C. (2019). Development and assessment of a mold design curriculum corresponding to industry 4.0 based on the CDIO principles. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 1526-1539.‏
Tseng, F. C. , Huang, M. H. , & Chen, D. Z. (2020). Factors of university–industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(2), 560-577.
Weerasinghe, I. M. S., & Dedunu, H. H. (2021). Contribution of academics to university–industry knowledge exchange: A study of open innovation in Sri Lankan universities. Industry and Higher Education, 35(3), 233-243.
Wei-Te, L. I. U. (2017). From industrial 4.0 to manufacturing 4.0: TVET in response to the 4th industrial revolution and current digitization in Taiwan, 31-31.
Xing, B. (2019). Towards a magic cube framework in understanding higher education 4.0 imperative for the fourth industrial revolution. Handbook of research on challenges and opportunities in launching a technology-driven international university (pp. 107-130). IGI Global. 
Samiyan, M., (2018). The relationship between the core and professional competencies of agricultural students and the social structure of education with the mediating role of educational motivation, Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 10(4), 37-56. [in Persian].