طراحی، اعتبار سنجی و اثر بخشی تلفیق آموزش ریاضی و مهارت‎های کارآفرینی فناورانه در آموزش مهندسی با رویکرد تولید دانش‎بنیان

احمدجواهری, خدیجه; پارساپور, آتسا

doi:10.22047/ijee.2025.528484.2179

طراحی، اعتبار سنجی و اثر بخشی تلفیق آموزش ریاضی و مهارت‎های کارآفرینی فناورانه در آموزش مهندسی با رویکرد تولید دانش‎بنیان

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

خدیجه احمدجواهری ¹

آتسا پارساپور ²

¹ عضو هیات علمی گروه ریاضی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بندرعباس، بندرعباس، ایران

² گروه ریاضی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بندرعباس، بندرعباس، ایران

10.22047/ijee.2025.528484.2179

چکیده

تولید مبتنی‎بر دانش و کارآفرینی فناورانه راهبردهای اصلی توسعۀ صنعتی هستند. بنابراین، بازنگری بنیادین در آموزش ریاضی برای دانشجویان مهندسی ضرورتی انکارناپذیر است. آموزش سنتی ریاضیات مهندسی، به‎‌رغم غنای نظری، مهارت‌های تحلیلی، اقتصادی و فناورانه را برای تصمیم‌گیری در فرایندهای تولید و توسعۀ محصولات نوآورانۀ دانشجویان تقویت نکرده است. هدف پژوهش حاضر طراحی، اعتبارسنجی و اثربخشی چهارچوب تلفیق آموزش ریاضی و مهارت‌های کارآفرینی فناورانه در برنامۀ درسی رشته‌های مهندسی است. روش پژوهش از نوع آمیختۀ اکتشافی است. در بخش کیفی، ازطریقِ مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته، هشت مؤلفه را شناسایی کردیم. در مرحلۀ کمّی، پرسشنامه‌ای 60‎گویه‌ای، مبتنی‎بر یافته‌های کیفی طراحی و توزیع کردیم. در تحلیل کمّی داده‌ها، یافته‌ها نشان داد که چهارچوب پیشنهادی از پنج مؤلفۀ اصلی تشکیل شده است: 1. آموزش مبتنی‎بر مسائل واقعی صنعت، 2. استفاده از داده‌های واقعی تولیدی، 3. تحلیل مالی - ریاضی پروژه‌ها، 4. ادغام فناوری‌های نوین در یادگیری و 5. ارتباط مستقیم با محیط‌های تولیدی. نتایج حاکی از اثربخشی این چهارچوب بر ارتقای توانمندی تصمیم‌گیری برای تولید، سرمایه‌گذاری هوشمندانه در تولید و تقویت بینش کارآفرینی فناورانۀ دانشجویان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

آموزش ریاضی

برنامۀ درسی مهندسی

کارآفرینی فناورانه

20.1001.1.16072316.1404.27.108.3.9

عنوان مقاله English

DESIGN, VALIDATION AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR INTEGRATING MATHEMATICS EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP SKILLS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION WITH A KNOWLEDGE-BASED PRODUCTION APPROACH

نویسندگان English

Khadijeh Ahmad Javaheri ¹

Atossa Parsapour ²

¹ Department of Mathematics, BA.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

² Department of Mathematics, BA.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

چکیده English

Knowledge-based production and technological entrepreneurship are considered the primary strategies for industrial development; hence, a fundamental review of mathematics education for engineering students is an undeniable necessity. The traditional education in engineering mathematics, despite its theoretical richness, has not been able to strengthen students’ analytical, economic, and technological skills necessary for making decisions in production processes and developing innovative products. The current research was conducted to design, validate and assess the structural effectiveness of integrating mathematics education and technological entrepreneurship skills in the engineering curriculum. The research method is a mixed exploratory type. In the qualitative part, eight components were identified through semi-structured interviews. In the quantitative part, a 60-item questionnaire based on qualitative findings was designed and distributed. In the quantitative data analysis, the findings revealed that the proposed framework comprises five main components: education based on real industry problems, utilizing real production data, financial and mathematical analysis of projects, integrating new technologies into learning, and direct communication with production environments. The results indicate the effectiveness of this framework in enhancing the ability to make decisions for production, intelligent investment in production, and strengthening the technological entrepreneurship insight of students.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Mathematics education

engineering curriculum

technological entrepreneurship

Baghersad, V. & Rahimi Asiyaberki, H. (2023). Dimensions of teaching technological entrepreneurship skills. Iran’s First National Skill Conference, Tehran, Iran. [in Persian].
Baghersad, V. & Rahimi Asiabaraki, H. (2024). Providing a framework for technological entrepreneurship development skills. Karafan Journal, e211498. doi: 10.48301/kssa.2024.470591.2958. [in Persian].
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications, New York, United States.
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2019). Principles of corporate finance. (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education/ Europe, Middle East & Africa, New York, United States.
Brennan, R. W. Johnston, K., Li, S., Nelson, N., Nygren, A., Paul, R., & Sullivan, M. (2020). Experience and reflection on an integrated mathematics curriculum an engineering articulation program. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) Conference. doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.14146.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (Rev. ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, New Jersey, United States. doi: 10.1016/C2013-0-10517-X.
Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Los Angeles, United States. (A. Kiamanesh and J. Sarabi, Trans.). Tehran: Aiizh Press. [in Persian].
Daeechian, Y., Hejazi, S. R., Faraji, A. & Yadollahi Farsi, J. (2024). Design-entrepreneurship framework in engineering education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 17(2), 106-130. doi: 10.22059/jed.2024.370865.654318 [in Persian].
Deo, S. & Hölttä-Otto, K. (2024). Critical thinking assessment in engineering education: A Scopus-based literature review. Journal of Mechanical Design, 146(7), 072301, (17 pages). doi: 10.1115/1.4064275.
Donndelinger, J. A. (2021). Applying problem-based learning to improve student engagement in an engineering economics course. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 23(3), 252-257. doi: 10.33423/jabe.v23i3.4351.
Duval-Couetil, N., Haghighi, S. & Reed, T. K. (2012). Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2): 425-435.
Emadi, S. R., Nasiri, F. & Mirzaie, M. (2025). Predicting students’ entrepreneurial skills based on their technological literacy and instructors’ teaching styles (Case study: Bu-Ali Sina University). Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 3(4), 27-42. doi: 10.22034/jer.2024.2039771.1182. [in Persian].
Fedoseev, V. V., Rodionov M. M., Shabanov G. G., Pasin A. & Puchkov N. (2022). Mathematics in professional education: Fundamentals of the methodology of teaching engineering mathematics. INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC, Moscow, Russia. doi: 10.12737/1859606.
Fink, F. K. (2002). Problem-based learning in engineering education: A catalyst for regional industrial development. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1(1), 29-32.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi: 10.2307/3151312.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge, New York, United States. doi: 10.4324/9780429056765.
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate data analysis. (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA, Massachusetts, United States.
Hosseinzadeh, H. & Ahmadi, S. A. A. (2021). Design and highlighting the technological entrepreneurship model in researching institutes of country (Case study: Research Institute of the ministry of labor and social welfare). Governmental Accounting, 7(2), 211-228. doi: 10.30473/gaa.2021.56969.1444. [in Persian].
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
Kaya-Capocci, S., Pabuccu-Akis, A. & Orhan-Ozteber, N. (2025). Entrepreneurial STEM education: Enhancing students’ resourcefulness and problem-solving skills. Research in Science Education, 55, 103-134. doi: 10.1007/s11165-024-10189-y.
Rahimi Kolour, H., Nikkhah, Y. & Ebrahimzadeh, M. (2024). The effect of technological entrepreneurship on the growth of Iranian knowledge-based firms in the fields of biotechnology, agriculture, and food by emphasizing the mediating role of digitalization and innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurial Strategies in Agriculture, 11(1), 79-91. doi: 10.61186/jea.11.1.79. [in Persian].
Rivas, D. F. & Husein, S. (2022). Empathy, persuasiveness and knowledge promote innovative engineering and entrepreneurial skills. Education for Chemical Engineers, 40, 45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2022.05.002.
Saber Kohne Goorabi, M. H., Iranmanesh, S. H. & Jafari, P. (2021). Technological entrepreneurship model with open innovation approach: sustainable development of oil and gas knowledge-based companies. Program and Development Research, 2(3), 44-71. doi: 10.22034/pbr.2021.145864. [in Persian].
Salvador, R., Barros, M. V., Barreto, B., Pontes, J., Yoshino, R. T., Piekarski, C. M. & de Francisco, A. C. (2023). Challenges and opportunities for problem-based learning in higher education: Lessons from a cross-program Industry 4.0 case. Industry and Higher Education, 37(1), 3-21. doi: 10.1177/09504222221100343.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 5-15. doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. doi: 10.4337/9781781007990.
Skinner, W. (1969). Manufacturing-missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 47(3), 136-145.
Sörensen, A., Mitra, R., Hulthén, E., Hartmann, T., & Clausen, E. (2022). Bringing the entrepreneurial mindset into mining engineering education. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 39, 1333 - 1344. doi: 10.1007/s42461-022-00620-1.
Starshinova, T. A. (2022). Multilevel integration: processes in engineering education. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 236. 143-148. doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-236-143.
Stenard, B. S. (2021). Interdisciplinary skills for STEAM entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 6(1), 32-59. (Original work published 2023). doi: 10.1177/25151274211029204..
Suto, Y., Moriya, H., Ikenoue, Y. & Sasaki, Y. (2025). Developing future engineering leaders: Evaluating a novel entrepreneurship education course. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), 101084. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101084.
Tabibzadeh, F., Hejazi, S. R. & Mousakhani, M. (2023). Investigating and designing a technological entrepreneurship model in biotechnology. Journal of Technology Development Management, 11(2), 37-92. doi: 10.22104/jtdm.2024.6455.3217. [in Persian].
Torkashvand, A. & Seraji, F. (2021). The role of technological literacy on entrepreneurial intention in engineer students: Findings of a mixed method research. Curriculum Planning Knowledge & Research in Educational Sciences, 17(40(67)), 72-89 [in Persian].
Washko, F. M., Edwards, W. S. & Washko, L. A. (2021). Entrepreneurship education in engineering using key performance indicators. IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). Princeton, NJ, USA, 292-295. doi: 10.1109/ISEC52395.2021.9764013.
Zaeim, A., MosaKhani, M. & Davari, A. (2022). Identifying and analyzing the dimensions of Iran’s technological university entrepreneurship ecosystem from the perspective of experts in university incubators. Public Policy in Management, 13(46), 1-12. doi: 10.30495/ijpa.2022.20381. [in Persian].