پیاده‏ سازی یک روش آموزش مهندسی در زمان محدود: مطالعۀ موردی کارگاه اتومکانیک عمومی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

نصیری, صیاد; کابلی, شهریار; خطیبی, بهروز

doi:10.22047/ijee.2026.579953.2244

پیاده‏ سازی یک روش آموزش مهندسی در زمان محدود: مطالعۀ موردی کارگاه اتومکانیک عمومی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

صیاد نصیری ¹

شهریار کابلی ²

بهروز خطیبی ³

¹ عضو هیات علمی/دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

² عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

³ مدرس مدعو، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

10.22047/ijee.2026.579953.2244

چکیده

توسعۀ فزایندۀ فنّاوری‏ های مختلف در دنیای امروز امری اجتناب ‏ناپذیر است. انتقال حجم انبوه اطلاعات به دانشجویان و عمق بخشیدن به فرایند یادگیری در زمان محدود، ازطریق روش ‏های آموزش‏ سنتی، دشوار و گاه غیرممکن است. علت آن است که میزان محتویات و سرفصل‏ های آموزش روبه ‏افزایش است ولی نمی‏ توان متناسب با آن، زمان آموزش را از محدودۀ استانداردشده افزایش داد. هدف از این پژوهش پیاده ‏سازی یک روش آموزش مهندسی و مهارتی در زمان محدود است تا بتوان حجم مشخصی از اطلاعات را در زمان کم به‏ صورت تجربی و مهارتی به دانشجویان انتقال داد تا فرایند یادگیری مؤثری ایجاد شود. در این پژوهش 253 نفر دانشجو در قالب 48 گروه 4 تا 6 نفره مشارکت داشتند. این دانشجویان طی 6 ساعت آموزشی، 8 بخش از سیستم ‏های خودرو را در 3 سطح دانش، نگرش و مهارت مورد بررسی، تحلیل و آزمایش قرار ‏دادند و نتایج را در کاربرگ ازپیش طراحی‏ شده، ثبت کردند. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‏ دهد که میانگین نمرات کسب‏شده حدود 80/0 بالاترین نمره، میانگین انحراف معیار سطوح ارزشیابی در سطح قابل قبول و کمتر از 3/0 و میزان اثربخشی این روش بر مبنای مقدار اندازه اثر کوهن، برابر 67/0 است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

آموزش مهندسی

آموزش مهارتی

اهداف رفتاری

روش آموزش

ارزشیابی

20.1001.1.16072316.1405.28.110.6.3

موضوعات

تنوع در آموزش مهندسی

عنوان مقاله English

IMPLEMENTING A TIME-LIMITED ENGINEERING TRAINING METHOD: A CASE STUDY OF THE GENERAL AUTO-MECHANICS WORKSHOP ATSHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

نویسندگان English

Sayyad Nasiri ¹

Shahriyar Kaboli ²

Behrouz Khatibi ³

¹ Faculty member/Sharif University of Technology

² Faculty member, Sharif University of Technology

³ Lecturer, Sharif University of Technology

چکیده English

The increasing development of various technologies in today’s world is inevitable. Transferring a massive volume of information to students and deepening the learning process within a limited timeframe is difficult and sometimes impossible through traditional teaching methods. This is because educational content and syllabi are expanding, whereas training time cannot be proportionally extended beyond standardized limits. This study aims to implement a time-limited engineering and skills-based training method to efficiently transfer a specific volume of information to students through empirical and practical approaches, thereby establishing an effective learning process. A total of 253 students participated in this study, organized into 48 groups of 4 to 6 members. Over a 6-hour training period, these students examined, analyzed, and tested 8 automotive system components across three domains: knowledge, attitude, and skill, recording their results in pre-designed worksheets. The findings indicate that the mean score achieved was approximately 80% of the maximum possible score. Furthermore, the mean standard deviation across evaluation levels remained within an acceptable range of less than 0.3, and the effectiveness of this method, based on Cohen’s d effect size, was found to be 0.67.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Engineering training

skill training

behavioral goals

training method

evaluation

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university, Open University Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2014). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.) Maidenhead, Open University Press.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Longman.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, SAGE.
Elsdon, M., Hayman, R., & Agrawal, P. (2025). The impact of group-based experiential learning in developing undergraduate societal engineering skills: A case study within a United Kingdom Post-92 university. European Journal of Engineering Education. Advance online publication.
Enzebati, M., & Hojjat Panah Montazeri, N. (2013). A QFD-based model for designing the curriculum and a case study. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 59, 59-73. [In Persian]
Graham, R. (2018). The global state of the art in engineering education (MIT Report). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67-86.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.
Kaboli, Sh., Nasiri, S., Haghshenas, H., Mottaghipour, M., Jahantigh Pak, A., Pircheraghi, GH., Arghavani Hadi, J. (2022). General workshop: a course for practical training or an introduction to engineering, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, [In Persian].
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Hand book II: Affective domain, David Mckay Company Incorporated.
Lavado-Anguera, S., Velasco-Quintana, P., & Terrón-López, M. (2024). Project-based learning as experiential pedagogy in engineering education: a review of the literature, education, sciences, MDPI, Basel.
Mehta, A., & Mehta, N. (2025). Impact of experiential learning on learning outcomes using Kolb’s model. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Indo-Universal Collaboration for Engineering Education (IUCEE).
Musibaudeen, O. I., Oluseyi A. A., Busayo S. A., Seun, O. (2021). A learning model for effective teaching of entrepreneurship engineering using workshop technology as a case study, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Volume 35, No. 2.
Nasiri S., & Kaboli Sh. (2022). Effectiveness of short-term skills training workshop for automatic transmission based on Kirkpatrick evaluation model, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, [In Persian].
Ogunbote, S., Dawodu, R. A., Adegunle, F. O., Adenuga, B.,&Adeyemi.(2025). The impact of adequate workshop tools and equipment on the skill development of automobile and metalwork technology education students in South West Universities of Education in Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(11), 72-84.
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases, Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138.
Sadeghi Tabar, R. (2024). Introducing pre-training workshop sessions to enhance learning in multidisciplinary environments: A case study in computer-aided engineering and design. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2367896.
Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Garay-Rondero, C. L., & Arana-Solares, I. A. (2023). Digitally enabled experiential learning spaces for engineering education 4.0. Education Sciences, 13(1), Article 63.
Shivaramu, H. T., Aveen, K. P., & Ullal, V. N. (2025). The role of experiential learning in improving academic performance and student satisfaction in engineering education. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 545.
Tembrevilla, G., Phillion, D., Zeadin, M. (2024). Experiential learning in engineering, a systematic review, Journal of Engineering Education, Wiley Periodicals LLC.