شناسایی مهم‏ترین عوامل مؤثر بر عملکرد دستیاران آموزشی در رشته ‏های مهندسی

مسیبی, سید علی; خانی الموتی, محمود

doi:10.22047/ijee.2025.487523.2130

شناسایی مهم‏ترین عوامل مؤثر بر عملکرد دستیاران آموزشی در رشته ‏های مهندسی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

سید علی مسیبی ¹

محمود خانی الموتی ²

¹ استادیار دانشکده راه آهن دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران

² دانشجو دکترا دانشگاه صنعتی امیر کبیر (پلی‌تکنیک تهران)

https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2025.487523.2130

چکیده

امروزه، دستیاران آموزشی نقش انکارناپذیری در بهبود یادگیری دانشجویان دارند. بنابراین، شناسایی و رفع مشکلات دانشجویان کیفیت آموزش و یادگیری آنان‏‏ را به‏ طور درخورِتوجهی بهبود خواهد بخشید. هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی مهم‏ترین عوامل تأثیرگذار بر عملکرد دستیاران آموزشی بوده و راهکارهای بهبود عملکرد آنان را نیز مطرح کرده است. براین‏ اساس، پس از شناسایی مهم‏ترین عوامل تأثیر‏گذار، پرسش‏نامه ‏ای در اختیار 156 نفر از دانشجویان با سابقۀ دستیاری آموزشی قرار گرفت و میزان پایایی پرسش‏نامه براساس روش آلفای کرونباخ 78/0 برآورد شد. برای بررسی درستیِ روابط درنظرگرفته ‏شده در مدل پژوهش، از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی (CFA) استفاده کردیم. نتایج نشان ‏دهندۀ وجود رابطه ‏ای معنادار میان هر شش متغیر پنهان، با سازۀ اصلی عملکرد دستیاران، بود. همچنین، از دید بیشتر دستیاران (96 درصد)، هماهنگی بیشتر با استادان ازطریقِ برگزاری جلسات منظم از نکات تأثیر‏گذار به ‏شمار می‏‏ رود. از سویی، اغلب دستیاران آموزشی (83 درصد) با تکرار دوبارۀ همۀ مطالب بیان‏ شدۀ استادان چندان موافق نیستند و بیشتر آنان (71 درصد) برگزاری کارگاه های آموزشی مرتبط را چندان موجب افزایش مهارت تدریس شان‏‏ نمی‏‏ دانند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

دستیاران آموزشی

دانشجویان رشته &‌‌rlm

های مهندسی

آموزش

تحلیل عاملی تأییدی

20.1001.1.16072316.1404.27.107.7.1

موضوعات

پژوهش در آموزش مهندسی

عنوان مقاله English

IDENTIFYING THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS AFFECTING THE PERFORMANCE OF TEACHING ASSISTANTS (TAS) IN ENGINEERING FIELDS

نویسندگان English

Seyed Ali Mosayebi ¹

Mahmoud Khani Alamoti ²

¹ Assistant Professor of the Faculty of Railways, Iran University of Science and Technology

² PHD Candidate at Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)

چکیده English

Today, teaching assistants play an undeniable role in improving student learning. Therefore, identifying their problems can lead to a significant improvement in the quality of students’ teaching and learning. The aim of this research is to investigate the most important factors affecting the performance of teaching assistants, and at the end, solutions are presented with the aim of helping to improve their performance. So, after identifying the most important influencing factors, a questionnaire was given to 156 students with teaching assistant experience. The reliability of the questionnaire was estimated as 0.78 based on Cronbach’s alpha method. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to check the correctness of the relationships considered in the model. The results indicated the existence of a significant relationship between all six latent variables with the main structure of assistants’ performance. Also, the most important results showed that from the point of view of most assistants (96%), more coordination with professors through holding regular meetings is among the most effective factors. Also, most of the teaching assistants (83%) do not agree with repeating all the material stated by the professors. Most of them (71%) do not consider holding related training workshops to increase their teaching skills too.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Teaching assistants

engineering students

education

confirmatory factor analysis

Abili, K., Mostafavi, Z. A.-S. & Narenji Sani, F. (2018). Identifying the competencies of teaching assistants in the electronic teaching-learning process: a qualitative research [in Persian].
Audras, D., Zhao, A., Isgar, C. & Tang, Y. (2022). Virtual teaching assistants: A survey of a novel teaching technology. International Journal of Chinese Education, 11(2), 2212585X221121674.
Boman, J. S. (2013). Graduate student teaching development: Evaluating the effectiveness of training in relation to graduate student characteristics. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(1), 100-114.
Brown, J. & Devecchi, C. (2013). The impact of training on teaching assistants’ professional development: Opportunities and future strategy. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 369-386.
Brown, J. D. (2002). The Cronbach alpha reliability estimate. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 6(1).
Butt, R. (2018). ‘Pulled in off the street’and available: what qualifications and training do Teacher Assistants really need? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2. 217-234, (3)2.
Carter, M., Stephenson, J. & Webster, A. (2019). A survey of professional tasks and training needs of teaching assistants in New South Wales mainstream public schools. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44(4), 447-456.
Farbod, I. (2018). Structural equation modeling in questionnaire data using Amos24 software. Mehregan Ghalam [in Persian].
Filz, T. & Gurung, R. A. (2013). Student perceptions of undergraduate teaching assistants. Teaching of Psychology, 40(1), 48-51.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gefen, D. & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information systems, 16(1), 5.
Green, J. L. (2010). Teaching highs and lows: exploring university teaching assistants’experiences. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9(2), 108-122.
Levy, P. S. & Lemeshow, S. (2013). Sampling of populations: methods and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Luo, J., Bellows, L. & Grady, M. (2000). Classroom management issues for teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 41, 353-383.
Marbouti, F., Rodgers, K. J., Jung, H., Moon, A. & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2013). Factors that help and hinder teaching assistants’ ability to execute their responsibilities. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Meadows, K. N., Olsen, K. C., Dimitrov, N. & Dawson, D. L. (2015). Evaluating the differential impact of teaching assistant training programs on international graduate student teaching. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(3), 34-55.
Memarian, H., Shirban, L. & Shekarchizadeh, M. (2015). Development of teaching and learning skills in teaching assistants of engineering programs. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 17(65), 59-78 [in Persian].
Muzaka, V. (2009). The niche of graduate teaching assistants (GTAs): Perceptions and reflections. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-12.
Park, C. (2002). Neither fish nor fowl? The perceived benefits and problems of using graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) to teach undergraduate students. Higher Education Review, 35(1), 50-62.
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497.
Reeves, T. D., Marbach-Ad, G., Miller, K. R., Ridgway, J., Gardner, G. E., Schussler, E. E. & Wischusen, E. W. (2016). A conceptual framework for graduate teaching assistant professional development evaluation and research. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(2), es2.
Sharma, U. & Salend, S. J. (2016). Teaching assistants in inclusive classrooms: A systematic analysis of the international research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 41(8), 118-134.
Sohoni, S., Cho, Y. & French, D. P. (2013). A survey to capture needs assessment for graduate teaching assistant training. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(3), n3.
Viktorin, J. (2018). Teacher assistant in the inclusive school environment. The Educational Review, USA, 2(6), 320-329.
Wald, N. & Harland, T. (2020). Rethinking the teaching roles and assessment responsibilities of student teaching assistants. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(1), 43-53.
Weidert, J. M., Wendorf, A. R., Gurung, R. A., & Filz, T. (2012). A survey of graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants. College teaching, 60(3), 95-103.
Wright, M. C., Bergom, I. & .Brooks, M. (2011). The role of teaching assistants in student-centered learning: Benefits, costs, and negotiations. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 331-342.
Zhu, J., Li, Y., Cox, M. F., London, J., Hahn, J. & Ahn, B. (2013). Validation of a survey for graduate teaching assistants: Translating theory to practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 426-443.