نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار و عضو هیات علمی دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

به‏ منظور شناخت چالش‏ های روزافزونی که مهندسان با آنها مواجه هستند، نیاز به بررسی جامع رویکردهای مهندسی انسان‏ گرایانه، مهندسی بوم ‏گرایانه، مهندسی جهان‏ شمول و مهندسی کل ‏نگر است. فلسفه و هدف این مقاله، ضمن پاسخ به این نیاز، مقایسه این رویکردها و ارائه ویژگی‏های توصیفی و کاربردی آنها در حوزه ‏های مختلف است. این پژوهش بر اساس هدف، توسعه‏ ای کاربردی، بر اساس شیوه گردآوری داده، توصیفی، و بر اساس ماهیت داده، کیفی از نوع مقایسه ‏ای است. نتایج نشان می‏دهد که درهم‏ کنش این رویکردها برای حل مسائل پیچیده مهندسی، ضروری است. همچنین آموزش مهندسی، نیاز به بازنگری اساسی دارد تا موضوعات رویکرد کل‏ نگر، هم‏نشینی با اهداف توسعه پایا، اخلاق و مسئولیت ‏پذیری اجتماعی، توازن دانش فنی و دیدگاه‏ های انسان‏ گرایانه و بوم‏ گرایانه و ترویج دیدگاه ‏های جهانی و شایستگی فرهنگی در پداگوژی مهندسی را دربرگیرد. لازم است که نه تنها راه‏ حل‏های فنی، بلکه ابعاد اجتماعی، اخلاقی و بوم‏ شناختی چالش‏ های مهندسی نیز مد نظر قرار گیرند. آموزش‏ های محیط‏زیستی و اجتماعی، یادگیری اجتماعی و تجربی، همکاری میان‏ رشته ‏ای، مطالعه موردی و ارائه تجربیات بین ‏المللی، جهت آماده‏ سازی مهندسان برای مقابله با چالش‏های محلی و جهانی، بسیار حیاتی است. این موارد می‏توانند در توسعه فهم عمیق ‏تری از مسائل مختلف، به دانشجویان مهندسی کمک کنند. همچنین باعث می‏ شوند که مهندسان آینده، دارای دانش و مهارت ‏های لازم برای طراحی و پیاده ‏سازی راهکارهای نوآورانه مناسب، فرهنگ ‏مدار و قابل ‏قبول از نظر محیط‏ زیستی باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

SYNERGY OF HUMANISTIC, ECOCENTRIC, COSMOPOLITAN, AND HOLISTIC ENGINEERING APPROACHES FOR REVISING ENGINEERING EDUCATION

نویسنده [English]

  • Mahdi Kolahi

Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Water and Environment Research Institute, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

چکیده [English]

To comprehend the growing challenges faced by engineers, it is necessary to comprehensively examine humanistic, ecocentric, cosmopolitan, and holistic engineering approaches. This article aims to fulfill this need by providing descriptive and practical features of these approaches in various fields. The research takes an applied and developmental approach, aligning with the objective, employs a descriptive and qualitative analysis method, and adopts a comparative approach based on the nature of the data. The analysis reveals that addressing complex engineering problems necessitates the synergy of these perspectives. Furthermore, a fundamental revision of engineering education is essential to incorporate a holistic approach that aligns with sustainable development goals, promotes social ethics and responsibility, balances technical and humanistic/ecocentric perspectives, and cultivates global and cultural competencies in engineering pedagogy. Apart from technical solutions, the social, ethical, and ecological dimensions of engineering challenges must be considered. Vital for preparing engineers to tackle local and global challenges are environmental and social education, experiential and social learning, interdisciplinary collaboration, case studies, and international experiences. These approaches enable engineering students to develop a deeper understanding of diverse issues and equip future engineers with the requisite knowledge and skills to design and implement innovative, environmentally conscious, and culturally sustainable solutions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Humanistic engineering
  • ecocentric engineering
  • cosmopolitan engineering
  • holistic engineering
  • sustainable development
Albert, L. (2020, June). Sustainable engineering: A comparative study of freshman and senior perspectives. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. WW Norton & Company.
Asr, E. T., Kakaie, R., Ataei, M., & Mohammadi, M. R. T. (2019). A review of studies on sustainable development in mining life cycle. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 213-231.
Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2012). Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable?. Routledge.
Bolton, M. L. (2022). Humanistic Engineering: Engineering for the People. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 41 (4), 23-38.Bucciarelli, L. L. (2008). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33 (2), 141-149.
Bulleit, W., Schmidt, J., Alvi, I., Nelson, E., & Rodriguez-Nikl, T. (2015). Philosophy of engineering: What it is and why it matters. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141 (3), 02514003.
Capra, F. (1997). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. Anchor.
Cheshmehzangi, A., & Griffiths, C. J. (2014). Development of green infrastructure for the city: a holistic vision towards sustainable urbanism. Journal of Architecture and Environment, 2 (2), 13-20.
Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5 (4), 512-523.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 103-120.
Engineering (2023). Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/engineering.
Grasso, D., & Burkins, M. (Eds.). (2010). Holistic engineering education: Beyond technology. Springer Science & Business Media.
Handford, M., Van Maele, J., Matous, P., & Maemura, Y. (2019). Which “culture”? A critical analysis of intercultural communication in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 108 (2), 161-177.
Hynes, M., & Swenson, J. (2013). The humanistic side of engineering: Considering social science and humanities dimensions of engineering in education and research. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 3 (2), 4.
Kingdon, P. (2018). The cosmopolitan engineering student: an analysis of a recruitment campaign for KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 787-802.
Kingdon, P. (2021). Correction to: The cosmopolitan engineering student: an analysis of a recruitment campaign for KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31, 199-200.
Kloot, B., Shaw, C., & Ahmed, N. (2022, November). Engaging the social in engineering. In 2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Kolahi, M. (2021). Natural Resources Stakeholders. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 8 (1), 19-30. [In Persian].
Kolahi, M., Boroumand, A. (2023). Identifying the root causes for the marginalization of the presentation of the introduction to the environment course in Iran’s higher education. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development (accepted).
Maciejewski, A. A., Chen, T. W., Byrne, Z. S., De Miranda, M. A., Mcmeeking, L. B. S., Notaros, B. M., ... & Notaros, O. (2017). A holistic approach to transforming undergraduate electrical engineering education. IEEE Access, 5, 8148-8161.
Markolf, S. A., Chester, M. V., Eisenberg, D. A., Iwaniec, D. M., Davidson, C. I., Zimmerman, R., ... & Chang, H. (2018). Interdependent infrastructure as linked social, ecological, and technological systems (SETSs) to address lock-in and enhance resilience. Earth’s Future, 6 (12), 1638-1659.
Marynowski, R. (2021). Supports and barriers for teacher professional learning and growth. STEM 2021 Proceedings Preface, 50 (3), 284.
Mihelcic, J. R., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2014). Environmental engineering: Fundamentals, sustainability, design. John Wiley & Sons.
Molina-Motos, D. (2019). Ecophilosophical principles for an ecocentric environmental education. Education Sciences, 9 (1), 37.
Mora, H., Signes-Pont, M. T., Fuster-Guilló, A., & Pertegal-Felices, M. L. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 140-150.
Ortiz-Marcos, I., Breuker, V., Rodríguez-Rivero, R., Kjellgren, B., Dorel, F., Toffolon, M., ... & Eccli, V. (2020). A framework of global competence for engineers: The need for a sustainable world. Sustainability, 12 (22), 9568.
Petroski, H. (1985). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. St Martins Press.
Poluan, A. R., Heydemans, N. A., Langi, F. M., & Nainggolan, A. M. (2020, November). Green education: study on understanding of perception and implementation of environmentally friendly behaviour an IAKN manado. In ICCIRS 2019: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Christian and Inter Religious Studies, ICCIRS 2019, December 11-14 2019, Manado, Indonesia (p. 6). European Alliance for Innovation.
Ramirez-Mendoza, R. A., Morales-Menendez, R., Melchor-Martinez, E. M., Iqbal, H. M., Parra-Arroyo, L., Vargas-Martínez, A., & Parra-Saldivar, R. (2020). Incorporating the sustainable development goals in engineering education. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14, 739-745.
Ramos, B., dos Santos, M. T., Vianna Jr, A. S., & Kulay, L. (2023). An institutional modernization project in chemical engineering education in Brazil: Developing broader competencies for societal challenges. Education for Chemical Engineers, 44, 35-44.
Sartal, A., Bellas, R., Mejías, A. M., & García-Collado, A. (2020). The sustainable manufacturing concept, evolution and opportunities within Industry 4.0: A literature review. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 12 (5), 1687814020925232.
Senthil, R. (2020). Enhancement of engineering education by incorporating active learning methodologies. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34 (1), 2349-2473.
Staack, I., Amadori, K., & Jouannet, C. (2019). A holistic engineering approach to aeronautical product development. The Aeronautical Journal, 123 (1268), 1545-1560.
Tamassoki, E., & Kolahi, M. (2023). Conceptual model for ethical roots of environmental crisis. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 9 (4), 77-88. doi: 10.22067/jwsd.v9i4.2209.1180
Thompson, J. D., Kokkinaki, A., Parker, J., Böttger, H. M., & Kasdin, N. J. (2021, January). Designing a new holistic engineering program. In 2021 CoNECD.
UNESCO. (2021). Engineering for sustainable development: Delivering on the sustainable development goals. UN.
Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., Van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education, 109 (3), 508-555.
Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it (Vol. 141). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.